AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.3 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Clinical Medicine | Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Diagnostic efficacy of metagenomic next-generation sequencing for spinal infections

Shuang LIU1, Jinyue HE1, Hui CHEN2, Yu XIANG1, Sheng LIAO2, Zuoqiang YAN1, Huorong GOU2, Hang YANG2, Zhongrong ZHANG2, Zehua ZHANG1,2, Jianzhong XU1,2( )
Department of Orthopedics, First Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing
Department of Spine Surgery, Jiangbei Branch of First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), No. 958 Hospital of PLA Army, Chongqing, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Objective

To comparatively evaluate the diagnostic value of metagenomic nextgeneration sequencing (mNGS) versus conventional microbial culture in spinal infections.

Methods

A cross-section design was conducted on 82 consecutive patients with suspected spinal infections treated between February 2022 and January 2024 at Jiangbei Branch of First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University). Microbiological culture, histopathological examination, and mNGS results from infected specimens were analyzed. Clinical diagnosis, primarily based on clinical manifestations, laboratory tests and radiologic features combined with medical history, was defined as the gold standard, and then the diagnostic performance, including sensitivity and specificity, were compared between mNGS and microbial culture.

Results

Among the 82 patients, definitive microbiological evidence was identified in 70 cases, and mNGS demonstrated a significantly higher detection rate than microbial culture (64 vs 36 cases, 78. 05% vs 43. 9%, P<0. 05). mNGS also obtained obviously higher sensitivity, accuracy, and negative predictive value (NPV), and notably lower positive predictive value (PPV) when compared to conventional microbial culture (all P<0. 05). When stratified by infection type, mNGS obtained significantly higher sensitivity and accuracy compared to microbial culture in tuberculous spinal infections (P<0. 05). For non-tuberculous spinal infections, mNGS also showed superior sensitivity to microbial culture (P<0. 05).

Conclusion

In patients with spinal infections, mNGS demonstrates a significantly higher pathogen detection rate than conventional microbial culture. This technique can provide early and broad-spectrum pathogenic microbiological evidence for spinal infection.

CLC number: R372; R446.9; R681.51 Document code: A

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Army Medical University
Pages 2254-2261

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
LIU S, HE J, CHEN H, et al. Diagnostic efficacy of metagenomic next-generation sequencing for spinal infections. Journal of Army Medical University, 2025, 47(18): 2254-2261. https://doi.org/10.16016/j.2097-0927.202505022

513

Views

2

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 12 May 2025
Revised: 31 August 2025
Published: 30 September 2025
© 2025 Journal of Army Medical University

This is an open access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).