AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (521.7 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Clinical Medicine | Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Correlation between biopsy rate and positive rate of biopsy in assessment of diagnostic competence in endoscopists

Wen CHEN1Hengyu WANG1Li RAO3Xue ZHANG2Hong YANG2Qian ZHOU4Lei CHEN1( )
Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing
Department of Gastroenterology, No. 958 Hospital of PLA Army, Chongqing
Department of Gastroenterology, Zhongxian People’s Hospital, Chongqing
Department of Gastroenterology, Guiqian International Hospital, Guiyang, Guizhou, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Objective

To explore whether the biopsy rate and the positive rate of biopsy during colonoscopy can serve as effective indicators for evaluating the diagnostic proficiency of endoscopists.

Methods

Total fifteen endoscopists from the First Affiliated Hospital of Army Military Medical University, Guiqian International General Hospital and No. 958 Hospital of PLA Army were enrolled and served as the study subjects. According to their years of experience, gender and working hours, they were divided into a senior group (n=8) and a junior group (n=7), a male group (n=9) and a female group (n=6), and a morning period (08: 00-12: 00) and an afternoon period (13: 00-18: 00). The data of all patients examined by the aforementioned endoscopists between January 2023 and December 2023 were collected, including the basic demographics, colonoscopic results, biopsy outcomes and pathological diagnoses of the patients. ANOVA was used to analyze the differences in the biopsy rate and positive rate of biopsy existed among the endoscopists of different years of experience, gender and working at different periods (morning and afternoon). Additionally, multivariate logistic regression analysis was employed to identify the independent risk factors associated with positive rates of biopsy.

Results

The senior group had significantly lower biopsy rate [(5. 73±0. 81)% vs (6. 89±0. 97)%], but obviously higher positive rate of biopsy [(53. 52±3. 87)% vs (33. 70±7. 85)%] than the junior group (both P<0. 01). The biopsy rate was notably higher during the morning working time period than the afternoon working time period in all the endoscopits [(6. 76±1. 11)% vs (5. 53±1. 57)%, P<0. 05]. Logistic regression analysis showed that the years of experience [(53. 52±3. 87)% vs (33. 70±7. 85)%, OR=92. 187, 95%CI: 3. 118~2 725. 366, P<0. 01) and working time [(48. 35±10. 50)% vs (37. 80±10. 65)%, OR=20. 885, 95%CI: 1. 266~344. 602, P<0. 05) were influencing factors for positive rate of biopsy.

Conclusion

The biopsy rate is low and positive rate of biopsy is high among the senior experienced endoscopists, while, opposite results are seen in the junior experienced clinicians, indicating correlation of biopsy rate and positive rate of biopsy with diagnostic proficiency of endoscopists.

CLC number: R181.23; R192.3; R574.62 Document code: A

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Army Medical University
Pages 728-733

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
CHEN W, WANG H, RAO L, et al. Correlation between biopsy rate and positive rate of biopsy in assessment of diagnostic competence in endoscopists. Journal of Army Medical University, 2025, 47(7): 728-733. https://doi.org/10.16016/j.2097-0927.202412022

1

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 05 December 2024
Revised: 20 January 2025
Published: 15 April 2025
© 2025 Journal of Army Medical University

This is an open access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).