AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (4.5 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Monographic Report | Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Diagnostic value of endoscopic LCPL sign for high-risk intestinal metaplasia in gastric mucosa

Xipeng ZHENG1Huilin PAN1Linyu WU1Yongying HOU2Qin LIU1Qiang MA2Xiuyuan QIN3Kaijun LIU1Bin WANG1Dongfeng CHEN1Tao WANG1( )
Department of Gastroenterology, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Precise Prevention and Treatment of Digestive Malignancies
Department of Pathology, Army Medical Center of PLA/ Daping Hospital of Third Military Medical University, Chongqing
First Clinical College of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the diagnostic value of endoscopic sign of light blue crest (LBC) capsuling papillary lesion (LCPL) for high-risk intestinal metaplasia (IM).

Methods

A total of 314 patients (352 biopsy specimens) who underwent endoscopic examination and biopsy in Department of Gastroenterology of Army Medical Center of PLA from January 2021 to June 2023 were recruited, and HE and HID-AB staining (the golden standard of high-risk IM) were apllied to detect the histological types and IM types. The samples were subsequently divided into chronic inflammation group, low-risk IM group, high-risk IM group, well-differentiated intestinal-type gastric cancer group, and poorly-differentiated intestinal-type gastric cancer group. The positive rate of LCPL in each group and its diagnostic efficacy were analyzed based on endoscopic images of the biopsy sites. Logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the relationship between LCPL sign and high-risk IM, as well as the clinical and pathological features associated with LCPL sign. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of LCPL for high-risk IM, using indicators such as sensitivity, specificity, Youden index and area under the curve (AUC).

Results

The positive rate of the LCPL sign in high-risk IM group was 75.70%, significantly higher than that of the other groups (all P<0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that LCPL sign was significantly correlated with high-risk IM (OR=30.286, 95%CI: 13.528~67.804, P<0.001). When the sign was employed in diagnosing high-risk IM, the sensitivity was 69.84%, the specificity was 93.75%, the Youden’s index was 0.636, and the AUC value was 0.818 (95%CI: 0.773~0.857). Besides sensitivity, all above parameters of LCPL sign showed significantly better diagnostic efficacy than those of traditional LBC sign, which is used as a sign for diagnosing IM (P<0.001). Moreover, recognition of LCPL sign was not easily affected by age (OR=1.130, 95%CI: 0.709~1.800, P=0.607), lesion site (Angular incisure: OR=2.360, 95%CI: 0.732~7.613, P=0.151; Autrum: OR=2.257, 95%CI: 0.756~6.744, P=0.145), and presence of peptic ulcers (OR=1.085, 95%CI: 0.208~5.652, P=0.923). Significantly, 94.12% of positive and 66.94% of negative LCPL signs could be rapidly recognized within 3 s (OR=4.536, 95%CI: 1.372~14.997, P=0.013).

Conclusion

LCPL sign shows high efficacy and potential clinical application value for high-risk IM in gastric mucosa of endoscopic diagnosis.

CLC number: R573; R730.49; R735.2 Document code: A

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Army Medical University
Pages 407-416

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
ZHENG X, PAN H, WU L, et al. Diagnostic value of endoscopic LCPL sign for high-risk intestinal metaplasia in gastric mucosa. Journal of Army Medical University, 2025, 47(5): 407-416. https://doi.org/10.16016/j.2097-0927.202409149

2

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 27 September 2024
Revised: 27 December 2024
Published: 15 March 2025
© 2025 Journal of Army Medical University

This is an open access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).