AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.1 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese

Clinical efficacy of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy for local advanced gastric adenocarcinoma

Lei WANG1,2Linghong WAN1Tao WANG1Zhongyi QIN1Fan LI3Wenkang LIU1Bin WANG1( )
Department of Gastroenterology, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Digestive Malignancies, Army Medical Center of PLA, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, 400042
Changzhou Branch of No. 904 Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force of PLA, Changzhou, Jiangsu Province, 213003, China
Department of Gastric and Colorectal Surgery, Army Medical Center of PLA, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, 400042
Show Author Information

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the therapeutic efficacies of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NAIC) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for local advanced gastric adenocarcinoma and analyze the clinicopathological characteristics.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 243 patients with locally advanced gastric cancer admitted in Army Medical Center of PLA (Daping Hospital) and the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University from January 2017 to July 2023. After balancing the confounding factors by inclusion and exclusion criteria and propensity score matching (PSM), the tumor pathological regression (TRG) rate and safety of the 2 neoadjuvant treatment regimens were analyzed, and the clinical pathological characteristics were analyzed to find clinical pathological characteristics related to efficacy.

Results

After using PSM to balance the baseline characteristics of the 2 groups of patients, 53 subjects in each group were included in the analysis. In terms of TRG, the pathological complete response (pCR) rate in the NAIC group (13 patients, 25%) was significantly higher than that in the NAC group (2 patients, 3.8%, P<0.05). Similar results were observed in terms of major pathological response (MPR), with 23 patients (43%) in the NAIC group achieving MPR, while 9 patients (17%) in the NAC group achieved MPR (P<0.05). In terms of safety, the incidence of treatment-related adverse events(TRAEs) of any grade in the NAIC group and the NAC group was comparable (96.2% and 96.2%, respectively). In an exploratory subgroup analysis of tumor pathological regression, the patients with clinicopathological features such as age <65 years, male, stage Ⅲ~ⅣA of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging, histological type of adenocarcinoma, high-moderate differentiated, intestinal-type gastric cancer, stage T3~4 of clinical T-staging, and stage N2~3 of clinical N-staging were more likely to benefit from NAIC.

Conclusion

NAIC results in a higher rate of pathological regression and a comparable incidence of adverse events when compared with chemotherapy alone for patients with local advanced gastric adenocarcinoma.

CLC number: R730.51;R730.53;R735.2 Document code: A

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Army Medical University
Pages 2313-2321

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
WANG L, WAN L, WANG T, et al. Clinical efficacy of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy for local advanced gastric adenocarcinoma. Journal of Army Medical University, 2024, 46(20): 2313-2321. https://doi.org/10.16016/j.2097-0927.202405076

944

Views

25

Downloads

0

Crossref

11

Scopus

10

CSCD

Received: 20 May 2024
Revised: 25 July 2024
Published: 30 October 2024
© 2024 Journal of Army Medical University