AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (485.4 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Clinical Medicine | Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasonography for duodenal papillary carcinoma and analysis on influencing factors

Jia YANG1Ziyi WANG1Lei CHEN1Yao ZHANG2Jing CHEN1Liping GAO3Xiaofeng FENG1( )
Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, China
Department of Army Epidemiology, Faculty of Military Preventive Medicine, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, China
Department of Plastic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in the preoperative staging and ductal dilatation of duodenal papillary carcinoma and analyze the factors influencing its diagnostic accuracy.

Methods

A cross-sectional trial was conducted on the patients with pathologically-diagnosed duodenal papillary carcinoma and undergoing EUS in the First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University from January 2018 to August 2023. The diagnostic value of EUS for the preoperative staging of duodenal papillary carcinoma was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the factors affecting the diagnostic accuracy of EUS.

Results

A total of 102 patients with duodenal papillary carcinoma were included, including 59 males and 43 females, at a mean age of 62 years, and all of them underwent EUS before diagnosis. The accuracy of EUS for tumor T-staging was 86.27%, the sensitivity and specificity for T1, T2, T3, and T4 lesions were 84.21%, 92.31%, 85.00%, 60.00%, and 95.31%, 88.89%, 96.34%, and 98.97%, respectively. The positive predictive value for T-staging of T1, T2, T3, and T4 lesions was 91.43%, 83.72%, 85.00%, and 75.00%, and the negative predictive values were 91.04%, 94.92%, 96.34%, and 97.96%, respectively. There were 14 patients whose T-staging was incorrectly staged by EUS. The accuracy of EUS in assessing intraductal dilatation was 75.49%, and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for ductal dilatation were 96.97%, 66.67%, 98.97%, and 40.00%, respectively. In addition, the independent predictors of diagnostic accuracy of EUS for pancreatic duct dilatation were nerve infiltration, tumor size, and T stage; whereas the independent risk factors for diagnostic accuracy of bile duct dilatation were nerve infiltration and alkaline phosphatase.

Conclusion

EUS has quite higher diagnostic value for preoperative staging of duodenal papillary carcinoma, and nerve infiltration, tumor size, T stage, T stage and alkaline phosphatase may be the influencing factors for its diagnostic accuracy.

CLC number: R181.32;R730.41;R735.31 Document code: A

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Army Medical University
Pages 2561-2568

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
YANG J, WANG Z, CHEN L, et al. Diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasonography for duodenal papillary carcinoma and analysis on influencing factors. Journal of Army Medical University, 2024, 46(22): 2561-2568. https://doi.org/10.16016/j.2097-0927.202312048

82

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 08 December 2023
Revised: 06 September 2024
Published: 30 November 2024
© 2024 Journal of Army Medical University

This is an open access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).