AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (576.8 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese

Efficacy and safety of switching to flumatinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia who have not achieved optimal response or are intolerant to TKI treatment

Songfan YANG1,2Qin WEN2Ying ZHANG3Jinglong LYU4Hua'e SHU5Hongju YAN2Cheng ZHANG2Jin WEI1Xi ZHANG2,6 ( )
Department of Hematology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan Province, 637002, China
State Key Laboratory of Trauma and Chemical Poisoning, Medical Center of Hematology, Military Key Clinical Specialty, Chongqing Key Clinical Specialty, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Hematology and Microenvironment, Second Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, 400037
Department of Hematology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 401336, China
Department of Hematology, Three Gorges Hospital Affiliated to Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 404100, China
Department of Hematology, Kaizhou People's Hospital, Chongqing, 405400, China
Jinfeng Laboratory, Chongqing, 401329, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Objective

To observe the efficacy and safety of flumatinib conversion in chronic myelogenous leukemia-chronicphase (CML-CP) patients with suboptimal TKI response or intolerance.

Methods

Patients who did not have the best response or intolerance to first-line imatinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib and switched to flumatinib (600 mg/d) from February 2020 to August 2022 were collected from 5 hospitals from Chongqing and affiliated hospitals of North Sichuan Medical College.The efficacy and safety of flumatinib were observed.The optimal response rate, major molecular response (MMR), cumulative complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) rate, cumulative MMR rate, cumulative deep molecular response (DMR), progression-free survival (PFS), event-free survival (EFS) and adverse reactions in 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment were observed and analyzed.

Results

A total of 100 patients with CML-CP were enrolled, with a median follow-up of 18(3~36) months.The optimal response rate was 92.6%(88/95), 94.4%(85/90) and 92.9%(79/85) respectively, at 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment.Till August 20, 2023, the cumulative CCyR and MMR rate was 98.0%(98/100) and 81.9%(77/94), respectively, the median time to reach CCyR and MMR was 3 months, and cumulative DMR rate was 51.0%(51/100).PFS rate was 100.0%(100/100) and 1-year EFS rate was 85.6%(75/90).The most common non-hematologic adverse reactions of flumatinib were diarrhea and abdominal pain (7.0%), followed by renal dysfunction (6.0%) and musculoskeletal pain (2.0%).The main hematologic adverse reactions were thrombocytopenia (12.0%), anemia (6.0%) and leukopenia (2.0%).

Conclusion

Flumatinib has better MMR and DMR and is well tolerated in CML-CP patients with TKI resistance or intolerance.

CLC number: R181.32;R733.7;R979.12 Document code: A

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Army Medical University
Pages 340-346

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
YANG S, WEN Q, ZHANG Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of switching to flumatinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia who have not achieved optimal response or are intolerant to TKI treatment. Journal of Army Medical University, 2024, 46(4): 340-346. https://doi.org/10.16016/j.2097-0927.202310076

783

Views

9

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 20 October 2023
Revised: 25 December 2023
Published: 28 February 2024
© 2024 Journal of Army Medical University