AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (606.8 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese

Development and validation of interpretation bias questionnaire with ambiguous scenarios

Feiyu ZHENG1Zhengzhi FENG2( )
Outpatient Department, Hospital of Troop 94833, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, 332100
Faculty of Medical Psychology, Army Medical University(Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Objective

To develop a depressive interpretation bias questionnaire with Chinese culture based on the similarity rating task(SRT), and to test its reliability and validity.

Methods

After being authorized, the ambiguous paragraphs in cognitive behavior modification errors prospective training items(CBM-I)were translated and screened in the first round, the screened paragraphs combined with the remaining of SRT and the self-written ambiguous paragraphs to form the screening questionnaire of the second round. Fourteen ambiguous paragraphs were selected as the items, and then the ambiguous situation interpretation bias questionnaire was compiled using SRT as the template. The reliability and validity analysis and item analysis were launched after 477 were tested by the questionnaire mentioned before.

Results

A 14-item-formed questionnaire was compiled after 2 rounds of screening, then 5 factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis, and the cumulative contribution rate was 52.67%. The confirmatory factor analysis showed that the five-factor model fitted well. Cronbach's α was 0.613, and split-half reliability was 0.617; Paired t-test was used to test the content validity, which showed significant difference between the target sentences and the foil sentences(t=-12.90, P<0.01). The questionnaire had good criterion validity, regarding the center for epidemiologic studies depression scale(CES-D)in Chinese version as criterion, while the total T score was significantly correlated with the total score of the CES-D(r=-0.224, P<0.01).

Conclusion

The interpretation bias questionnaire with ambiguous scenarios is a applicable measurement of depression interpretation bias in China.

CLC number: R395.1;R749.4 Document code: A

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Army Medical University
Pages 2586-2592

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
ZHENG F, FENG Z. Development and validation of interpretation bias questionnaire with ambiguous scenarios. Journal of Army Medical University, 2023, 45(24): 2586-2592. https://doi.org/10.16016/j.2097-0927.202301037

866

Views

17

Downloads

0

Crossref

1

Scopus

1

CSCD

Received: 11 January 2023
Revised: 20 March 2023
Published: 30 December 2023
© 2023 Journal of Army Medical University