AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (612.1 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese

Application of microdissection testicular sperm extraction for patients with non-obstructive azoospermia

Wei HONGYing WANGLin ZHUJunxuan LIUJitao ZENGTao SHANGGUANXufu CHENWei HE( )
Center for Reproductive Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University(Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the value and safety of microdissection testicular sperm extraction(MD-TESE)for patients with non-obstructive azoospermia(NOA).

Methods

A retrospective analysis study of 176 NOA patients diagnosed in our center from July 1, 2017 to March 15, 2022. According to sperm retrieval methods, they were divided into MD-TESE group and testicular sperm aspiration(TESA)group. The time of procedure, intra-operative bleeding, surgical complications(such as hematoma), sperm retrieval rate(SRR)and clinical outcome of in vitro fertilization were compared between the 2 groups.

Results

There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in age, body mass index(BMI), testicular volume, and levels of testosterone(T), luteinizing hormone(LH), anti-Müllerian hormone(AMH)and follicle-stimulating hormone(FSH)(P>0.05). The MD-TESE group had obviously longer operation time(P<0.001)and lower incidence of testicular hematoma rate[2.4%(1/42)vs 7.5%(10/134)] than the TESA group. No infections were observed in either group. SRR was significantly higher in MD-TESE group than the TESA group[38.1%(16/42)vs 9.0%(12/134), P<0.001]. When the obtained sperms were used in intracytoplasmic sperm injection(ICSI), no obvious differences were seen in the fertilization rate, cleavage rate, and clinical pregnancy rate between the MD-TESE group and TESA group(65.1% vs 58.3%, 93.9% vs 71.4%, 50.0% vs 50.0%).

Conclusion

MD-TESE is a safe and effective method for sperm retrieval in NOA patients, especially in those with cryptorchidism, viral orchitis and Y-chromosome AZFc microdeletions.

CLC number: R697.22;R698.2;R713.7 Document code: A

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Army Medical University
Pages 251-256

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
HONG W, WANG Y, ZHU L, et al. Application of microdissection testicular sperm extraction for patients with non-obstructive azoospermia. Journal of Army Medical University, 2023, 45(3): 251-256. https://doi.org/10.16016/j.2097-0927.202208194

452

Views

5

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

3

CSCD

Received: 27 August 2022
Revised: 07 October 2022
Published: 15 February 2023
© 2023 Journal of Army Medical University