AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (2.4 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese

Measurement, disparities, and obstacle factor analysis of safety resilience in China's Camellia oleifera

Jue ZHOU1Maolin YAN2( )Xin NIU2Zibo LIU3Yang ZHANG4
School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Information Technology, Beijing 100192, China
State Academy of Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing 102600, China
Forestry and Grassland Survey and Planning Institute of the National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing 100013, China
School of Economics and Management, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

【Objective】

By measuring the safety resilience levels of Camellia oleifera across the nation, core development regions, and key expansion areas, assessing spatial disparities among different production zones and provinces, and identifying obstacle factors affecting resilience, this study aims to provide actionable pathways for promoting high-quality industry development and enhancing overall Camellia oleifera security.

【Method】

A comprehensive safety resilience index system for Camellia oleifera was constructed. Using the entropy weight method, Theil index, and ArcGIS natural breaks classification, we analyzed the spatial distribution, regional disparities, and evolutionary trends of safety resilience across 15 major Camellia oleifera-producing provinces (autonomous regions/municipalities) from 2010 to 2022. Obstacle degree analysis was further employed to identify key constraining factors.

【Result】

1) The national average resilience level of Camellia oleifera exhibited sustained growth, with upward trends observed across different production zones and provinces, indicating significantly enhanced risk resistance and shock adaptability. By 2022, two provinces achieved high resilience status, while 12 were classified as moderately resilient; 2) The Theil index of Camellia oleifera safety resilience displayed a U-shaped trend, initially declining before rising, suggesting widening inter-provincial disparities primarily driven by intra-regional differences; 3) Key influencing factors included production-transportation-sales robustness, industrial coordination, technological advancement, forestry investment, fiscal expenditure on science and technology, and Camellia oleifera cultivation area, which substantially impacted resilience enhancement at both national and regional levels.

【Conclusion】

While safety resilience in Camellia oleifera production has strengthened nationwide and within major regions, inter-provincial disparities show signs of further divergence. Therefore, implementing regionally coordinated and precisely targeted policies, targeted mitigation of key obstacle factors, and enhancing holistic industrial chain synergy and market-driven mechanisms are critical strategies for improving Camellia oleifera safety resilience.

CLC number: S794.4 Document code: A Article ID: 1673-923X(2026)05-0201-13

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology
Pages 201-213

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
ZHOU J, YAN M, NIU X, et al. Measurement, disparities, and obstacle factor analysis of safety resilience in China's Camellia oleifera. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2026, 46(5): 201-213. https://doi.org/10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2026.05.020

141

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

CSCD

Received: 15 May 2025
Revised: 08 September 2025
Published: 25 May 2026
© 2026 Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology