AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (6.8 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese

Soil microbial community structure and diversity in different successive planting generations of Eucalyptus plantations

Shan XIONG1,2Deming YANG2Zhonglin WANG3Jun ZHAO3Guangyou LI2Wenping CHEN3Zhaohua LU2( )
College of Forestry, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, Guizhou, China
Research Institute of Tropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Guangzhou 510520, Guangdong, China
China Forestry Group Leizhou Forestry Bureau Co., Ltd, Zhanjiang 524043, Guangdong, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

【Objective】

To explore the effects and driving mechanisms of successive planting on soil microbial communities in Eucalyptus plantations.

【Method】

Using high-throughput sequencing, this study analyzed the structure and diversity of soil bacterial and fungal communities across four successive planting generations of Eucalyptus urophylla×E. grandis plantations in Leizhou peninsula. By combining with the determination of soil chemical properties, the interlinkages between soil microorganisms and environmental factors were also elucidated.

【Result】

1) Although fungal ACE, Chao1, and Shannon indices in the 40-80 cm layer were significantly higher in G2 than in other generations, successive planting exerted no significant effect on soil microbial alpha diversity. However, it significantly altered microbial community structures; 2) In all soil layers, the dominant bacterial phyla in each generation were Pseudomonadota, Acidobacteriota, Chloroflexi, and Actinomycetota, while the dominant fungal phyla were Basidiomycota and Ascomycota. In the 0-40 cm soil layer, with successive planting generations, the relative abundance of the soil bacterium Candidatus_Eremiobacterota significantly increased, in contrast to significant decreases in Bacteroidota. In terms of fungal community, the relative abundance of Ascomycota exhibited a pronounced downward trend, whereas Basidiomycota showed an initial decrease followed by an increase, with significant intergenerational differences in abundance; 3) Findings from correlation and redundancy analyzed indicated notable interconnections between soil microbial communities and physicochemical properties. Soil pH, available nitrogen (AN), available phosphorus (AP) and available boron (AB) were identified as key environmental factors driving the evolution of soil microbial community structure; 4) The results of partial least squares path model (PLS-PM) showed that successive planting had a significant direct negative effect on soil chemical properties, and further had a significant impact on the composition, structure and diversity of soil bacterial and fungal communities through direct or indirect effects.

【Conclusion】

This study reveals the evolution patterns of soil microbial community structure and diversity in different successive planting generations of Eucalyptus plantations, providing theoretical foundation for soil amelioration and sustainable silvicultural management of plantations.

CLC number: S792.39 Document code: A Article ID: 1673-923X(2026)02-0054-16

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology
Pages 54-69

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
XIONG S, YANG D, WANG Z, et al. Soil microbial community structure and diversity in different successive planting generations of Eucalyptus plantations. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2026, 46(2): 54-69. https://doi.org/10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2026.02.006

298

Views

3

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

CSCD

Received: 25 February 2025
Revised: 27 April 2025
Published: 25 February 2026
© 2026 Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology