AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (11 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article

Unravelling the Storage Degradation Mechanism of LiFePO4–Graphite Batteries

Yahao MU1Xin QIAO1,2Bo PEI2( )Jian PENG1 ( )Shuo WANG1( )
Center of Smart Materials and Devices, State Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Materials Synthesis and Processing, School of Material Science and Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
Wuhan Institute of Marine Electric Propulsion, Wuhan 430064, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Introduction

Lithium iron phosphate-graphite (LFP-C) batteries are widely used in various fields due to their high energy density, low cost, high safety, good rate performance, long cycle life, and environmental friendliness. However, prolonged calendar aging leads to increased internal resistance and capacity decay, thereby shortening their service life. In this work, the impacts of storage temperature and SOC on the calendar aging performance of LFP-C batteries were investigated. The results show that the capacity decay is more severe under high temperature and high SOC conditions. The structural evolution of the anode and cathode materials, as well as the cathode–electrolyte interphase (CEI) and solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) layers were analyzed. It is indicated that the structure of LiFePO4 cathode remains stable, while the degree of disorder in the graphite anode increases. The decomposition of the liquid electrolyte leads to an increase of LiF content in the CEI and SEI layers with decreasing Li2CO3 content in the SEI layer at 50 ℃.

Methods

In an inert atmosphere glove box, several LFP-C CR2025 coin cells were assembled. The cells were charged to the targeted SOC, and then divided into six groups and stored under different conditions (i.e., at 0℃-50%SOC, 0 ℃-100%SOC, 25 ℃ -50%SOC, 25 ℃-100%SOC, 50 ℃-50%SOC, and 50 ℃-100%SOC) for one month. After storage, each group of cells was cycled at 1C to assess the impact of different storage conditions on the electrochemical performance of the cells. Other cells were disassembled, and then cleaned to obtain the positive and negative electrodes. The capacity degradation mechanisms of batteries during calendar aging were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), Raman spectroscopy, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy dispersive X-Ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS).

Results and discussion

After 1-month storage, the LFP - graphite coin cells are charged and discharged at 1 C for 300 cycles. The results show that the cells stored at 50 ℃ cannot deliver any capacity. The cells stored at 0 ℃ exhibit a significantly higher discharge capacity, compared to the cells stored at 25 ℃. The cycling performance results of the cells after storage at different states of charge (SOC) indicate that the discharge capacity of coin cells stored at 50% SOC is higher than that of cells stored at 100% SOC.

It is revealed that there is a slight difference in the XRD patterns of LFP electrodes stored under various temperatures and SOC conditions, indicating that the structure of LFP maintains a high stability under various storage conditions. The XRD patterns of the graphite anodes also remain unchanged, and only the peaks attributed to the graphite and current collector Cu foil appear.

The results by Raman spectroscopy indicate that the LFP material remains stable after storage, while the degree of disorder in the graphite anode increases significantly and becomes more pronounced with the increase of storage temperatures and SOC. The results by FTIR reveal the side reaction products on the surfaces of both the cathode and anode materials (i.e., Li2CO3, (CH2OCOOLi)2, and ROCO2Li).

The results by SEM-EDX indicate that there is a slight change in the elemental ratio on the surface of the cathode electrodes after storage under different conditions, further validating the stability of the LFP material. The surface of graphite particles becomes rough after storage, and the content of fluorine and phosphorus elements on the surface of graphite anodes increases under high-temperature and high-SOC conditions.

The results by XPS show that the content of LiF in the CEI layers increases with increasing the temperature and SOC. The storage temperature shows a more pronounced effect on the composition of the CEI rather than the SOC. The relative content of LiF and P—F in the SEI layers significantly increases, while the relative content of Li2CO3 decreases due to decomposition as the storage temperature increases.

Conclusions

LiFePO4-graphite coin cells with different SOC (i.e., 50% and 100%) were stored at various temperatures (i.e., 0, 25 ℃ and 50 ℃) and for one month and then charged and discharged for 300 cycles. The results showed that cells stored at 50℃ were completely inoperative. The battery capacity retention followed an order of 0 ℃-50%SOC > 0 ℃-100%SOC > 25 ℃ -50%SOC > 2 ℃-100%SOC.

It was revealed that the LFP cathode exhibited a structural stability as the storage temperature and SOC increased. Conversely, the degree of disorder of graphite anode increased, having a detrimental effect on the lithium ion migration. It was evident that the temperature could have a dominant influence on the composition of the CEI rather than SOC. The relative content of Li2CO3 decreased, while the relative content of LiF decreased within the CEI layers as the storage temperatures and SOC increased. In addition, the relative content of LiF and P—F increased in the SEI layers with temperature, and the temperature had a more significant effect rather than SOC on the SEI layer.

CLC number: TQ152; TM912 Document code: A Article ID: 0454-5648(2025)07-2032-08

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society
Pages 2032-2039

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
MU Y, QIAO X, PEI B, et al. Unravelling the Storage Degradation Mechanism of LiFePO4–Graphite Batteries. Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2025, 53(7): 2032-2039. https://doi.org/10.14062/j.issn.0454-5648.20240812

852

Views

9

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Received: 24 December 2024
Revised: 11 January 2025
Published: 26 May 2025
© 2025 Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society