AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (2 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Clinical efficacy of intranasal acupuncture in the treatment of allergic rhinitis: a Meta-analysis

Ye-ling ZHANG1,2Wei-xi SUN1,2Yan-ru PENG1,2Xin MA1,2Li-li LIU1,2Lin-jing ZHANG1,2Zhan-feng YAN1,2( )
Department of Otolaryngology, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100700, China
Institute of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100700
Show Author Information

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intranasal acupuncture for allergic rhinitis (AR).

Methods

Randomized controlled trials on intranasal acupuncture for AR were searched in China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data Knowledge Service platform, VIP Database, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and The Cochrane Library from their inception to October 2024. The basic information, evaluation of the therapeutic efficacy, related scales, and laboratory indexes were screened and extracted by 2 independent reviewers. The scales included the Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS), the Total Nasal Symptom and Sneezing Score (TNNSS), Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ). Laboratory indicators focused on serum total IgE and serum interleukin-4 (IL-4) contents. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan software and Stata software.

Results

A total of 19 randomized controlled trials involving 1482 participants were included. The Meta-analysis indicated that, compared with conventional western medicines and nasal-external acupuncture, the intranasal acupuncture group achieved greater reductions in TNSS [MD=-1.67, 95% CI (-2.30, -1.04), P<0.00001], RQLQ score [MD=-3.14, 95% CI (-4.16, -2.12), P<0.00001], and TNNSS [MD=-0.52, 95% CI (-0.67, -0.36), P<0.00001] from baseline to post-treatment, and greater decreases in serum IgE [SMD=-1.17, 95% CI (-1.46, -0.87), P=0.00001] and IL-4 [SMD=-1.14, 95% CI (-1.80, -0.49), P=0.0006] levels. Adverse events were mainly mild epistaxis and localized pain.

Conclusion

Intranasal acupuncture appears superior to nasal-external acupuncture and western medicines in reducing nasal symptom severity and improving life quality in AR, with no obvious adverse events reported. However, because the existing studies generally have small sample sizes, limited methodological rigor in randomized designs, and substantial heterogeneity across studies, the reliability of the findings is limited. Therefore, large-sample, multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trials are needed to improve the quality level of the evidence.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
zcyj-50-12-1482_ESM.pdf (705.4 KB)

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Acupuncture Research
Pages 1482-1494

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
ZHANG Y-l, SUN W-x, PENG Y-r, et al. Clinical efficacy of intranasal acupuncture in the treatment of allergic rhinitis: a Meta-analysis. Acupuncture Research, 2025, 50(12): 1482-1494. https://doi.org/10.13702/j.1000-0607.20241322

628

Views

5

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

Received: 21 December 2024
Revised: 16 May 2025
Published: 25 December 2025
© The Editorial Office of Acupuncture Research

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).