AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.4 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese

Analysis of individual differences in controller workload

Qiuli GU1,2Lili WANG3( )
College of computer Science and Technology,Civil Aviation University of China,Tianjin 300300,China
College of Safety Science and Engineering,Civil Aviation University of China,Tianjin 300300,China
College of Air Traffic Management,Civil Aviation University of China,Tianjin 300300,China
Show Author Information

Abstract

To address the issue of individual variability in workload tolerance, this study establishes a quantitative model for assessing controller workload. A test was devised for the purpose of collecting data from 24 area controllers both before and after their workday. Based on the test data, variables were selected for analysis that were deemed to be sensitive in terms of describing the individual load. Three dimensions were included in the comprehensive evaluation index system: cognitive workload, physiological reaction load, and psychological perception load. A model for the individual load index of controllers was developed. The optimal weights of the individual load index were determined through the application of the entropy weight-CRITIC combination method. The individual workload index of each controller was subsequently calculated. It was determined that there are notable discrepancies in the individual workload of controllers. The cognitive workload index is a principal indicator of the magnitude of the individual workload index for controllers. The cognitive workload is a principal index for determining the magnitude of the controller’s individual workload index. Additionally, there is a positive correlation between cognitive workload and the controller’s capacity for information retrieval, decision-making, and reaction. To further investigate the factors influencing the growth of controllers’ cognitive workload, the reaction time, gaze time, and sweep time of controllers under five distinct traffic levels were quantified. Additionally, pre-post and post-post paired tests were conducted, and one-way analysis of variance was performed between groups with the same indicator. The results showed that while controllers’ reaction ability was more affected by flow parameters, their decision-making and searching abilities were more vulnerable to cumulative load.

CLC number: V355 Document code: A Article ID: 1001-5965(2026)07-2414-11

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics
Pages 2414-2424

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
GU Q, WANG L. Analysis of individual differences in controller workload. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2026, 52(7): 2414-2424. https://doi.org/10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2024.0351

4

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 23 May 2024
Published: 21 August 2024
© Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics