Discover the SciOpen Platform and Achieve Your Research Goals with Ease.
Search articles, authors, keywords, DOl and etc.
Battery thermal-management systems based on direct refrigerant cooling are characterized by multiple sources of disturbance, strong coupling, and nonlinearity, making regulation of the temperature difficult through traditional proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controllers. In this study, a dynamic step-down model of a direct cooling thermal-management system was first established based on the first principle, and its linearized model was verified using experimental data. Based on this model, a linear time-varying model-based predictive control strategy was designed and compared with PID control under two operating conditions: battery cooling and the worldwide harmonized light vehicles test cycle (WLTC). Under the condition of constant battery heat generation, the stabilization time for the battery temperature from 50 ℃ to 30 ℃ was 262 s for the model predictive control (MPC) strategy and 952 s for the PID control strategy. At the same time, the MPC reduced the energy consumption by 5.57%. Under the WLTC condition, the temperature fluctuation of the PID control was large, with a maximum deviation of 2.9 ℃, while the MPC was able to respond quickly to a heat load change and stabilize the control temperature at 30 ℃. The standard temperature deviations of the PID and MPC control strategies were 1.7 ℃ and 0.06 ℃, respectively. In summary, the MPC strategy was superior to the PID control in terms of temperature regulation speed, energy efficiency, and robustness.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Comments on this article