AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.8 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Dynamic Modeling and Model Predictive Control Study of Direct Cooling Thermal Management System for Batteries

Jiafeng Wang1Xiangguo Xu2,3( )
Ningbo Science and Innovation Center, Zhejiang University, Ningbo, 315100, China
Institute of Refrigeration and Cryogenics, Key Laboratory of Refrigeration and Cryogenic Technology of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310027, China
Center for Balance Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310027, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Battery thermal-management systems based on direct refrigerant cooling are characterized by multiple sources of disturbance, strong coupling, and nonlinearity, making regulation of the temperature difficult through traditional proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controllers. In this study, a dynamic step-down model of a direct cooling thermal-management system was first established based on the first principle, and its linearized model was verified using experimental data. Based on this model, a linear time-varying model-based predictive control strategy was designed and compared with PID control under two operating conditions: battery cooling and the worldwide harmonized light vehicles test cycle (WLTC). Under the condition of constant battery heat generation, the stabilization time for the battery temperature from 50 ℃ to 30 ℃ was 262 s for the model predictive control (MPC) strategy and 952 s for the PID control strategy. At the same time, the MPC reduced the energy consumption by 5.57%. Under the WLTC condition, the temperature fluctuation of the PID control was large, with a maximum deviation of 2.9 ℃, while the MPC was able to respond quickly to a heat load change and stabilize the control temperature at 30 ℃. The standard temperature deviations of the PID and MPC control strategies were 1.7 ℃ and 0.06 ℃, respectively. In summary, the MPC strategy was superior to the PID control in terms of temperature regulation speed, energy efficiency, and robustness.

CLC number: TB61+1; TP273; TM912 Document code: A Article ID: 0253-4339(2025)06-0023-11

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Refrigeration
Pages 23-33

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Wang J, Xu X. Dynamic Modeling and Model Predictive Control Study of Direct Cooling Thermal Management System for Batteries. Journal of Refrigeration, 2025, 46(6): 23-33. https://doi.org/10.12465/j.issn.0253-4339.2025.06.023

312

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

CSCD

Received: 25 November 2024
Revised: 14 February 2025
Accepted: 19 February 2025
Published: 16 December 2025
© 2025 The Editorial Office of Journal of Refrigeration

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).