AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (3.3 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Effect of Four Preservation Techniques on the Storage Quality of Rainbow Trout

Yanbin Qin( )Shaojie ZhangYuantao ShenBaolin Liu
School of Health Science and Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200093, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Rainbow trout were used as a research subject to investigate the effects of different preservation techniques on the quality and physicochemical properties of aquatic products during storage. Total volatile basic nitrogen (TVB-N), total viable count (TVC), pH, and drip loss rate were used as technical indicators. A comparative study was conducted on the preservation effects of four preservation methods on rainbow trout flesh, including refrigeration (4 ℃ ±1 ℃), ice temperature (-1 ℃ ±1 ℃), high-voltage electrostatic field (HVEF, 3k V/m) + ice temperature (-1 ℃±1 ℃), and HEVF (3 k V/m) + compound biological preservative (mass fraction: 1.40% chitosan + 0.05% lysozyme + 1.30% theaflavin) + ice temperature (-1 ℃ ± 1 ℃). The results showed that treatment with HVEF + compound biological preservatives effectively inhibited microbial growth. Samples from the refrigeration and ice temperature groups had already decayed by the 10th and 12th day, with TVC reaching 7.12 lg(CFU/g) and 7.13 lg(CFU/g), respectively. In contrast, the TVC values of the HVEF + ice temperature and HVEF + compound biological preservative + ice temperature groups were only 6.32 lg(CFU/g) and 5.89 lg(CFU/g) on the 12th day. On the 14th day of storage, the TVB-N of the HVEF + compound preservative + ice temperature group was only 20.17 mg/100 g, which was much lower than that of the other three groups. This investigation indicates that compared to refrigeration and ice-temperature storage, treatment with HVEF + composite preservatives can effectively delay the spoilage process of fish and extend the shelf life of rainbow trout by four days.

CLC number: TS254.1; S983; S965.122 Document code: A Article ID: 0253-4339(2025)04-0163-08

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Refrigeration
Pages 163-170

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Qin Y, Zhang S, Shen Y, et al. Effect of Four Preservation Techniques on the Storage Quality of Rainbow Trout. Journal of Refrigeration, 2025, 46(4): 163-170. https://doi.org/10.12465/j.issn.0253-4339.2025.04.163

1

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

CSCD

Received: 27 May 2024
Revised: 23 September 2024
Accepted: 26 September 2024
Published: 16 August 2025
© 2025 The Editorial Office of Journal of Refrigeration

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).