AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.3 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Performance Comparison of Three Booster-Assisted Ejector Refrigeration Cycles with Environmentally Friendly Refrigerants

Lingeng Zou1Jiarui Liu1,2Ye Liu1,3,4( )Jianlin Yu1,3
Department of Refrigeration and Cryogenic Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, China
Institute of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Ningbo Tech University, Ningbo, 315100, China
MOE Key Laboratory of Cryogenic Technology and Equipment, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, China
Shaanxi Saimo Energy Techololgy Co., Ltd., Xi'an, 710049, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

To address the low energy efficiency and significant performance reduction under high-temperature conditions of ejector refrigeration cycles (ERCs), this study proposed a novel booster-assisted ejector refrigeration cycle integrated with a vapor-liquid separator that exhibited a higher unit refrigeration capacity and reduced generator heat input. A thermodynamic analysis was conducted to compare the proposed cycle with two existing booster-assisted ejector refrigeration cycles, and the applicability of four environmentally friendly refrigerants was systematically evaluated. The results demonstrated that the improved cycle enhanced the performance by reducing the evaporator inlet vapor quality through vapor-liquid separation. Under typical operating conditions (generation temperature: 80 ℃, condensation temperature: 35 ℃, and evaporation temperature: 0 ℃), the proposed cycle achieved a coefficient of performance (COP) of 1.198, showing significant improvement over conventional cycles. R1234ze (Z) was identified as the optimal refrigerant because of its low Global Warming Potential (GWP) value and superior thermodynamic properties. A parameter sensitivity analysis revealed that the COP of the improved cycle increased with rising condensation temperature (from 1.168 at 30 ℃ to 1.232 at 40 ℃), whereas conventional cycles exhibited an opposite trend. When the generation temperature increased from 70 ℃ to 90 ℃, the COP of the improved cycle decreased by 28.6%; however, its refrigeration capacity remained higher than that of conventional cycles. This study provided a theoretical foundation for enhancing the energy efficiency of low-grade heat-driven refrigeration technologies and promoting the application of eco-friendly refrigerants.

CLC number: TB61+2; TB61+7 Document code: A Article ID: 0253-4339(2026)04-0106-07

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Refrigeration
Pages 106-112

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Zou L, Liu J, Liu Y, et al. Performance Comparison of Three Booster-Assisted Ejector Refrigeration Cycles with Environmentally Friendly Refrigerants. Journal of Refrigeration, 2026, 47(4): 106-112. https://doi.org/10.12465/issn.0253-4339.20250509001

2

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

CSCD

Received: 09 May 2025
Revised: 04 June 2025
Accepted: 10 July 2025
Published: 16 August 2026
© 2026 The Editorial Office of Journal of Refrigeration

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).