AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.6 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese

Comparison of Patient Satisfaction Between Gynecological Teaching Outpatient Clinics and General Clinics and Analysis of Influencing Factors

Xiaochen SONG, Huiying HU( ), Qian ZHOU, Jie YIN, Shuo LIANG, Xiaochuan LI, Rong CHEN, Lan ZHU
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, National Clinical Research Center for Women's Health and Obstetric and Gynecologic Diseases, Beijing 100730, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate patient satisfaction levels in a gynecological teaching clinic and to explore its associated influencing factors, so as to provide evidence for optimizing the operational model of teaching clinics.

Methods

This was a single-center retrospective cross-sectional survey. Patients who attended the gynecological teaching clinic(teaching clinic group) and the general outpatient clinic(general clinic group) at Peking Union Medical College Hospital from May 2023 to July 2025 were enrolled. Satisfaction wasassessed using the Chinese version of the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire-18, with the 5-level ordinal overall satisfaction as the primary outcome. Ordinal logistic regression was employed to identify independent influencing factors of satisfaction.

Results

A total of 1146 patients(578 in the teaching clinic group and 568 in the general clinic group) were enrolled, among whom 985 completed the questionnaire follow-up(496 in the teaching clinic group and 489 in the general clinic group), yielding a response rate of 85.95%. The 5-level ordinal overall satisfaction was higher in the teaching clinic group than in the general clinic group(OR=6.09, 95% CI: 3.74-9.91, P < 0.001), and the overall satisfaction score was also significantly higher in the teaching clinic group[(3.99±0.26) vs.(3.92±0.46), 95% CI: 0.02-0.11, P=0.005]. In terms of subdomains, the teaching clinic group scored better in doctor-patient communication[(3.99±0.57) vs.(3.81±0.63), P < 0.001], but scored lower in technical service quality[(3.03±0.19) vs.(3.26±0.48), P < 0.001] and humanistic care[(3.32±0.53) vs.(3.46±0.62), P < 0.001] compared with the general clinic group. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression analysis showed that consultation duration ≥ 10 minutes(OR=1.75, 95% CI: 1.14-2.70, P=0.011) and the teaching clinic model(OR=5.39, 95% CI: 3.25-8.95, P < 0.001) were independent positive influencing factors for higher patient satisfaction.

Conclusions

Patient satisfaction in the gynecological teaching clinic is relatively high, with notable strength in doctor-patient communication; however, there remains room for improvement in technical service quality and humanistic care. Adequate consultation duration and the teaching clinic model are associated with higher patient satisfaction.

CLC number: R711; R-4; R197.32 Document code: A Article ID: 1674-9081(2026)05-1390-07

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Pages 1390-1396

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
SONG X, HU H, ZHOU Q, et al. Comparison of Patient Satisfaction Between Gynecological Teaching Outpatient Clinics and General Clinics and Analysis of Influencing Factors. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2026, 17(5): 1390-1396. https://doi.org/10.12290/xhyxzz.2026-0743

5

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 28 May 2026
Accepted: 12 August 2026
Published: 21 August 2026
© 2026 Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital