AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.3 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese

Cost and Medical Efficiency Analysis of Indocyanine Green Fluorescence-Guided Thoracoscopic Resection of Lung Lesions under the DRG Payment System

Qian CHEN1, Chao GUO2, Shuchang WANG3, Wenhao DENG4, Tianan YANG4, Jiong ZHOU3( ), Xiaojun MA3( )
Party Committee Office, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
Medical Affairs Department, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
School of Management, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the clinical application value of indocyanine green(ICG) fluorescence-guided thoracoscopic lung lesion resection under the diagnosis related group(DRG) payment system, and to provide reference for the management of new medical technologies in healthcare institutions.

Methods

Discharged patients who underwent thoracoscopic segmentectomy and/or wedge resection at Peking Union Medical College Hospital from January 1, 2016 to May 31, 2024 were enrolled. Patients who received ICG fluorescence guidance were assigned to new technology group, while those who did not receive ICG fluorescence guidance were assigned to control group. Operative time, length of stay, cost consumption index, time consumption index, duration of ventilator use, total hospitalization cost, and 10 representative cost items were compared between the two groups. Propensity score matching(PSM) was further used to analyze the changes in these indicators after controlling for confounding factors including age, sex, DRG code, and surgical type.

Results

A total of 7999 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled, including 1392 patients(17.4%) in the new technology group and 6607 patients(82.6%) in the control group. Compared with the control group, the new technology group showed significantly shorter operative time and length of stay, and significant reductions in time consumption index, consultation and diagnostic fees, nursing fees, therapeutic medical material fees, bed fees, oxygen therapy fees, antibiotic fees, and albumin product fees, while the cost consumption index, total hospitalization cost, surgical fees, and surgical medical material fees were significantly increased(all P < 0.001). Among EB15(major thoracic surgery without important complications or comorbidities) patients, all indicators except duration of ventilator use, western medicine fees, and duration of invasive mechanical ventilation showed statistically significant differences between the two groups(all P < 0.001). Among patients in EB11(major thoracic surgery with important complications or comorbidities), only albumin product fees were significantly lower in the new technology group than those in the control group(P=0.003), with no statistically significant differences in other indicators(P > 0.05). In patients undergoing wedge resection alone, the new technology group showed significantly shorter operative time and length of hospital stay, as well as significant reductions in time consumption index, consultation and diagnostic fees, nursing fees, therapeutic medical material fees, bed fees, oxygen therapy fees, western medicine fees, antibiotic fees, and albumin product fees, total hospitalization cost and cost consumption index, while surgical medical material fees increased (P < 0.05). After PSM, the operative time in the new technology group was significantly shorter than that in the control group(P=0.022); except for increased western medicine fees, oxygen therapy fees, antibiotic fees, albumin product fees, and therapeutic medical material fees in the new technology group were all significantly lower than those in the control group(all P < 0.05).

Conclusions

ICG fluorescence-guided thoracoscopic lung lesion resection can significantly improve medical efficiency, optimize cost structure, and reduce perioperative supportive resource consumption. However, its clinical benefits vary significantly among patients with different surgical types or different DRG groups, so clinicians are advised to strengthen preoperative precise evaluation.

CLC number: R197.3; R655 Document code: A Article ID: 1674-9081(2026)05-1380-10

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Pages 1380-1389

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
CHEN Q, GUO C, WANG S, et al. Cost and Medical Efficiency Analysis of Indocyanine Green Fluorescence-Guided Thoracoscopic Resection of Lung Lesions under the DRG Payment System. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2026, 17(5): 1380-1389. https://doi.org/10.12290/xhyxzz.2026-0460

3

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 07 April 2026
Accepted: 24 June 2026
Published: 07 September 2026
© 2026 Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital