AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.6 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese

Expert Consensus on Blood Flow and Oxygen Delivery Phenotyping and Clinical Management of Septic Shock(2025)

Wei HUANG1Xinchen WANG2Wenzhao CHAI2Keliang CUI3Bo YAO4Zhiqun XING5Cui WANG6Jingjing LIU2Shiyi GONG2Dongkai LI2Wanhong YIN7Xiaoting WANG2( )Wei DU2( )
Department of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361003, China
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin 300060, China
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Qilu Hospital (Qingdao), Shandong University, Qingdao, Shandong 266000, China
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan 250021, China
Department of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230000, China
Department of Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Sepsis is a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. Septic shock is the primary cause of mortality in sepsis, with its core pathophysiological mechanism being severe ischemia and hypoxia in critical units—composed of microcirculation and the mitochondria of functional cells—resulting from disruptions in blood flow and oxygen flow following a dysregulated host response. Due to the systemically convergent yet clinically heterogeneous nature of the host response, current understanding and management strategies for hemodynamics remain inconsistent, often leading to inadequate resuscitation or overtreatment. To improve the quality of care, based on a systematic review of the "blood flow-oxygen flow" theory, an expert panel emphasizes reevaluating septic shock from an integrated perspective of blood flow and oxygen flow, and has formulated the Expert Consensus on Blood Flow and Oxygen Delivery Phenotyping and Clinical Management of Septic Shock (2025). The consensus proposes that clinical typing of blood flow-oxygen flow should comprehensively consider cardiac function, vascular tone, oxygen flow utilization status in critical units, and disease trajectory, while optimizing subtype identification by integrating host response phenotypes and artificial intelligence technologies. It advocates establishing a continuous assessment system through multi-site oxygen flow monitoring for organ perfusion, peripheral perfusion monitoring, and critical care ultrasound. Under the framework of the "critical care triangle", the consensus promotes the implementation of individualized, bundled management strategies, providing guidance for multiple management points to restore blood flow-oxygen flow matching, reduce the risk of organ failure, and decrease patient mortality.

CLC number: R-1; R631 Document code: A Article ID: 1674-9081(2026)01-0040-19

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Pages 40-58

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
HUANG W, WANG X, CHAI W, et al. Expert Consensus on Blood Flow and Oxygen Delivery Phenotyping and Clinical Management of Septic Shock(2025). Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2026, 17(1): 40-58. https://doi.org/10.12290/xhyxzz.2025-1152

850

Views

7

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 09 November 2025
Accepted: 06 January 2026
Published: 30 January 2026
© 2026 Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital