AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.5 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese

Expert Consensus on Neurocritical Care Monitoring and Management in Beijing and Tibet(2025)

Drolma Phurbu1Wenjin CHEN2Heng ZHANG3Jian ZHANG4Xiaomeng WANG5Guoying LIN1Wenjun PAN1Xiying GUI1Xin CAI1Chodron Tenzin1Jianlei FU1Qianwei LI1 Tseyang1Yijun LIU1Bo LIU1Tsering Drolma1Yudron Sonam1 Kyilv6Samdrup Tsering7Wa Da8Juan GUO9Cheng QIU10Huan CHEN11,12( )Xiaoting WANG11( )Yangong CHAO13Dawei LIU11Wenzhao CHAI11Chenggong HU14Wanhong YIN14Shihong ZHU15
Department of Critical Care Medicine, People's Hospital of Tibet Autonomous Region, Lhasa 850000, China
ICU, Department of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China
Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110121, China
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai 200040, China
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221000, China
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Shigatse People's Hospital, Shigatse, Tibet 857007, China
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Tibet Autonomous Region Tibetan Hospital, Lhasa 850002, China
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Lhasa People's Hospital, Lhasa 850013, China
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Qamdo People's Hospital, Qamdo, Tibet 854000, China
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Nagqu People's Hospital, Nagqu, Tibet 852000, China
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang 550002, China
Department of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Tsinghua University, Beijing 100016, China
Department of Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
Department of Critical Care Medicine, The Seventh Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100700, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Neurocritical care involves complex pathophysiological mechanisms, and its incidence is higher, injuries are more severe, and treatment is more challenging in high-altitude environments. This consensus, based on the latest domestic and international evidence-based medical data, establishes a standardized, goal-oriented framework for neurocritical care management applicable in high-altitude regions and nationwide. The consensus was developed following international standards for evidence quality assessment and underwent two rounds of Delphi expert consultation, resulting in 32 recommendation statements covering three parts: management systems, monitoring and assessment, and core strategies. Key updates include: advocating for the establishment of independent neurocritical care units and implementing precise tiered diagnosis and treatment based on the "Five Differences in Critical Care" concept; constructing a "trinity" multimodal brain monitoring system centered on cerebral blood flow, cerebral oxygenation, and brain function, emphasizing routine bedside transcranial Doppler ultrasound, cerebral oximetry, and continuous electroencephalography monitoring; shifting management strategies from mild hypothermia therapy to targeted temperature management, and defining the "446" target management pathway for the supercritical stage; emphasizing the assessment of static and dynamic cerebrovascular autoregulation functions through multimodal methods to achieve individualized optimal mean arterial pressure management; elevating cerebrospinal fluid management goals to the level of "glymphatic system" function maintenance; implementing a multidisciplinary collaborative, whole-process management model focusing on patients' long-term neurological functional outcomes; de-escalation criteria include multidimensional indicators such as recovery of brain structure, restoration of cerebrovascular autoregulation, improvement in cerebrospinal fluid dynamics, and reduction in biomarker levels; and integrating cutting-edge technologies like artificial intelligence into post-critical care management and rehabilitation planning. This consensus systematically integrates the entire process of neurocritical care management, reflecting the modern connotation of goal-oriented, dynamic, and multimodal integration in neurocritical care medicine. It aims to adapt to new trends such as deepening understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms, the integration of medicine and engineering, and the empowerment of artificial intelligence, thereby further advancing the discipline of critical care medicine.

CLC number: R45; R322.81 Document code: A Article ID: 1674-9081(2026)01-0059-14

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Pages 59-72

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Phurbu D, CHEN W, ZHANG H, et al. Expert Consensus on Neurocritical Care Monitoring and Management in Beijing and Tibet(2025). Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2026, 17(1): 59-72. https://doi.org/10.12290/xhyxzz.2025-1151

851

Views

10

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 08 November 2025
Accepted: 23 December 2025
Published: 30 January 2026
© 2026 Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital