AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.6 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese

Reporting Guidelines in Implementation Science: Overview, Categorization and Future Directions

Xiaoshan CHEN1Dadong WU2Run WANG3Qing ZHAO4Siyuan LIU4Wanqing HUANG1Zizhen HUANG1Yuting WAN1Huanyu HU4Junlin ZHU1Jiangyun CHEN1,5Zhiwei HUANG6Dong XU1,3,5( )
Acacia Lab for Implementation Science, Department of Health Management, School of Health Management, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
Maternal and Child Healthcare Medical Research Institute, Shenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen 518028, China
Southern Medical University Institute for Global Health (SIGHT), Dermatology Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510091, China
School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
Center for World Health Organization Studies, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
Department of Family Medicine & Primary Care, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518053, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Reporting guidelines are structured checklists for researchers to follow when reporting specific types of studies. As researches conducted in real-world settings to address practical issues, implementation research has stringent requirements for the replicability of result and the transparency of reporting, making its reporting guidelines particularly important. This paper systematically introduces the reporting guidelines in the field of implementation science, outlines their classification systems and scopes of application, and focuses on explaining the core characteristics and functions of five key reporting guidelines, including the Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI), Reporting guidelines for implementation and operational research, the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR), the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Enhanced (FRAME), and recommendations for specifying and reporting implementation strategies. Furthermore, combined with the PEDALs research paradigm in implementation science, this paper further clarifies the specific application pathways for reporting guidelines and discusses directions for refinement, aiming to provide references for researchers to select appropriate reporting guidelines.

CLC number: R-05;R-3;G353.1 Document code: A Article ID: 1674-9081(2025)04-1033-14

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Pages 1033-1046

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
CHEN X, WU D, WANG R, et al. Reporting Guidelines in Implementation Science: Overview, Categorization and Future Directions. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2025, 16(4): 1033-1046. https://doi.org/10.12290/xhyxzz.2025-0339

573

Views

14

Downloads

0

Crossref

1

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 11 April 2025
Accepted: 06 May 2025
Published: 09 June 2025
© 2025 Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital