AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.2 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese

The Application of Generative Artificial Intelligence in the Assessment of Critical Care Medicine for Standardized Resident Physician Training

Yuankai ZHOU1Pei LIU2Shengjun LIU1Yingying YANG1Siyi YUAN1Huaiwu HE1Yun LONG1( )
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100034, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Objective

To explore the application effectiveness of generative artificial intelligence(GAI) in the standardized training assessment of critical care medicine residents.

Methods

The study subjects included residents undergoing standardized training in the critical care medicine departments of Peking Union Medical College Hospital and Beijing Friendship Hospital from June to September 2024, as well as teaching physicians qualified for standardized training instruction. Two sets of GAI-generated examination papers (using Tongyi Qianwen 2.5) and one set of human-generated examination papers were administered to all residents. The answers were graded separately by teaching physicians and Tongyi Qianwen 2.5. The grading results from human and GAI evaluations were compared, and feedback from both residents and teaching physicians on the GAI-generated and human-generated papers was collected.

Results

A total of 35 residents and 11 teaching physicians were included in the study. The scores of residents on single-choice questions from the two GAI-generated papers were significantly higher than those from the human-generated paper(both P < 0.05), while the scores on multiple-choice questions were significantly lower(both P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the grading of short-answer questions among the three papers(all P > 0.05). In terms of subjective evaluations, both teaching physicians(P=0.007) and residents(P=0.008) perceived the GAI-generated papers as less difficult. However, there were no significant differences in content accuracy or alignment with the training syllabus between the GAI-generated and human-generated papers(all P > 0.05).

Conclusions

GAI performs comparably to human-generated papers in terms of examination paper creation and grading, but further optimization is needed regarding question difficulty. GAI holds promise as a valuable tool for enhancing the efficiency of resident teaching assessments.

CLC number: R459.7; G643 Document code: A Article ID: 1674-9081(2026)01-0286-06

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Pages 286-291

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
ZHOU Y, LIU P, LIU S, et al. The Application of Generative Artificial Intelligence in the Assessment of Critical Care Medicine for Standardized Resident Physician Training. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2026, 17(1): 286-291. https://doi.org/10.12290/xhyxzz.2024-0739

431

Views

5

Downloads

0

Crossref

1

Scopus

1

CSCD

Received: 18 September 2024
Accepted: 06 December 2024
Published: 27 February 2025
© 2026 Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital