AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.3 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese

Stakeholder Preference Assessment in Implementation Research

Run MAO1,2Yiyuan CAI1,2( )Chengming YANG1,2Jinglan PENG1Zhiqing NING3Siyuan LIU3,4Dong XU3,5,6
Acacia Lab for Primary Healthcare, Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Guizhou Medical University, Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Guiyang 561113, China
The Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Monitoring and Disease Control, Ministry of Education, Guizhou Medical University, Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Guiyang 561113, China
Acacia Lab for Implementation Science, Department of Health Management, School of Health Management, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
Southern Medical University Institute for Global Health(SIGHT), Dermatology Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510091, China
Center for World Health Organization Studies, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

In the process of conducting implementation research on health service issues, stakeholders' preference for contents related to evidence-based practice (EBP) and implementation strategies is closely related to whether EBP can be effectively implemented.However, multiple preference assessment methods exist, each with their own strengths, weaknesses, and application scenarios, which makes it challenging for researchers to select appropriate and effective preference assessment methods. This paper aims to review the origins, characteristics, and application scenarios of commonly used preference assessment methods, with the hope of providing valuable reference and lessons for domestic scholars to select and apply appropriate preference assessment methods in implementation research.

CLC number: R181.2; R-3; G304 Document code: A Article ID: 1674-9081(2024)06-1447-09

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Pages 1447-1455

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
MAO R, CAI Y, YANG C, et al. Stakeholder Preference Assessment in Implementation Research. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2024, 15(6): 1447-1455. https://doi.org/10.12290/xhyxzz.2024-0576

427

Views

4

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 25 July 2024
Accepted: 08 October 2024
Published: 08 November 2024
© 2024 Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital