AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.3 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese

Past and Present of Implementation Science (Part Ⅱ)——Theories, Paradigm, and Characteristics

Dong XU1,2,3Yiyuan CAI4,5Jiangyun CHEN1,3( )
Acacia Lab for Implementation Science, Department of Health Management, School of Health Management, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
Southern Medical University Institute for Global Health (SIGHT), Dermatology Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510091, China
Center for World Health Organization Studies, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Guizhou Medical University, Gui'an, Guizhou 561113, China
The Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Monitoring and Disease Control, Ministry of Education, Guizhou Medical University, Gui'an, Guizhou 561113, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Implementation science has evolved over more than 20 years and established a set of theories, models, and frameworks that can be used to guide the implementation process, identify implementation-influencing factors, and evaluate implementation effectiveness. Guided by theories, the implementation research paradigm has been developed to emphasize a problem-oriented approach that seeks to solve problems, identify barriers to implementing evidence-based practices, and selectively employ implementation strategies to facilitate their adoption, implementation, and maintenance. This paradigm also gives implementation research distinctive characteristics in terms of research design, including extensive use of theories, models, and frameworks, alignment with real-world and contextual settings, use of mixed research designs, use of rapid research methods, and optimization of interventions for the context in which they are to be implemented. As the second part of Past and Present of Implementation Science, this paper provides a brief introduction to the theories, paradigms, and characteristics of implementation science.

CLC number: R181.2; G304 Document code: A Article ID: 1674-9081(2024)03-0686-08

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Pages 686-693

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
XU D, CAI Y, CHEN J. Past and Present of Implementation Science (Part Ⅱ)——Theories, Paradigm, and Characteristics. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2024, 15(3): 686-693. https://doi.org/10.12290/xhyxzz.2024-0025

569

Views

8

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

11

CSCD

Received: 12 January 2024
Accepted: 19 April 2024
Published: 13 May 2024
© 2024 Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital