AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.8 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese

Application of Laparoscopic Jejunostomy in Minimal Invasive McKeown Esophagectomy

Luo ZHAOJia HEYingzhi QINZhijun HANHongsheng LIUShanqing LILi LI( )
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the safety and clinical value of laparoscopic jejunostomy in minimal invasive McKeown esophagectomy.

Methods

The clinical data of the patients undergoing minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy in the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital from January 2013 to June 2020 were retrospectively included, and according to postoperative nutritional support they were divided into oral intake group (January 2013 to October 2017) and jejunostomy group (November 2017 to June 2020). The operation time, postoperative hospital stay, complications, perioperative nutritional status and quality of life scores were compared between the two groups.

Results

A total of 190 patients with esophageal cancer who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled. There were 128 cases in jejunostomy group and 62 cases in oral intake group. Compared with the patients in oral intake group, those in jejunostomy group had shorter postoperative hospitalization time [11(9, 13)d vs. 14(13, 20)d, P < 0.001], the completion rate of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in the jejunostomy group was higher(95.16% vs. 75.00%, P=0.005). The operation time [335(300, 374)min vs. 330(310, 370)min, P=0.750] and the incidence of surgery-related complications(28.13% vs. 35.48%, P=0.748) showed no significant difference between the two groups. The body mass index in jejunostomy group was higher 1 month [(23.3 ± 3.5)kg/m2 vs. (21.7±3.9)kg/m2, P=0.006] and 3 months[(22.6±3.5)kg/m2 vs. (20.6±4.0)kg/m2, P < 0.001] after surgery, and the body weight decreasing rate was lower 1 month [(3.9 ± 2.2)% vs. (10.3±3.5)%, P < 0.001] and 3 months[(6.5±3.1)% vs. (15.7 ± 4.8)%, P < 0.001] after surgery than those in oral intake group. The quality of life symptom scores in both groups were increased and the physical functioning and summary scores were sharply decreased at day 7 after operation, and all scores were improved in different degrees 1 month after operation. Compared with the measurements in oral intake group, the symptom scores (except pain score 1 month after operation) were decreased, and the physical functioning and summary scores were increased in the jejunostomy group 7 days and 1 month after operation (all P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with oral nutrition, total laparoscopic jejunostomy has greater advantages in postoperative nutritional support and quality of life recovery in patients with esophageal cancer. It is also safe and unlikely to increase surgery-related complications.

CLC number: R655.4 Document code: A Article ID: 1674-9081(2022)05-0845-07

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Pages 845-851

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
ZHAO L, HE J, QIN Y, et al. Application of Laparoscopic Jejunostomy in Minimal Invasive McKeown Esophagectomy. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2022, 13(5): 845-851. https://doi.org/10.12290/xhyxzz.2021-0635

184

Views

2

Downloads

0

Crossref

1

Scopus

1

CSCD

Received: 05 September 2021
Accepted: 20 October 2021
Published: 30 September 2022
© 2024 Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital