AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (6 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Clinical Study | Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Study of the characteristics and correlation of the chin and airway in skeletal Class Ⅱ adult female patients with mandibular retraction

Yijiao YUAN1,2, Wen HAN3, Lei ZHEN1, Zhigang ZUO2, Yanhong ZHAO2( )
Department of Stomatology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai Tongji Hospital, Shanghai 200065, China
Department of Orthodontics, Tianjin Medical University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Oral Soft and Hard Tissues Restoration and Regeneration, Tianjin Medical University Institute of Stomatology, Tianjin 300070, China
Department of Prosthodontics, Shanghai Stomatological Hospital, Hospital of Stomatology, Fudan University & Shanghai Key Laboratory of Craniomaxillofacial Development and Diseases, Shanghai 200001, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Objective

To explore the characteristics and correlation of the chin and airway in females with skeletal Class Ⅱ mandibular retraction for reference for clinical diagnosis and therapy.

Methods

This study was approved by the hospital Medical Ethics Committee. Forty cases of skeletal Class Ⅱ mandibular retraction adult females with average angle were selected as the research group, and sixty cases of skeletal Class Ⅰ patients with average angle were selected as the control group. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images for all subjects were analyzed using threedimensional modeling software. Measurements included the chin morphology, position, and upper airway morphology.

Results

Compared with skeletal Class Ⅰ patients, patients with skeletal Class Ⅱ mandibular retraction had smaller anterior chin thickness, base bone volume, chin total volume, and larger chin angle, chin depression, chin curvature, and alveolar area with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). Gn-V, Gn-H, Po-NB distance, and facial angle were smaller, and the Y-axis angle was larger in patients with skeletal Class Ⅱ mandibular retraction with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). Upper airway total volume, transverse and sagittal diameter of the glossopharynx upper boundary were smaller in patients with skeletal Class Ⅱ mandibular retraction with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). The correlation analysis between the morphology and position of the chin and the morphology of the upper airway in patients with Class Ⅱ mandibular retraction showed that there was a negative correlation between chin angle and laryngopharynx length in patients with Class Ⅱ mandibular retraction (r = -0.277, P<0.01). There was a negative correlation between Po-NB distance and palatopharyngeal length (r = -0.222, P<0.05). Chin height (r = -0.261, P<0.01) and basal bone area (r = -0.225, P<0.05) were negatively correlated with the transverse diameter of the palatopharyngeal upper boundary.The minimum chin thickness (r = 0.245, P<0.05), chin angle (r = 0.249, P<0.05), and alveolar area (r = 0.213, P<0.05) were positively correlated with the sagittal diameter of the palatopharyngeal upper boundary. Gn-V (r = 0.217, P<0.05) and Po-NB distance (r = 0.208, P<0.05) were positively correlated with the transverse diameter of the glossopharynx upper boundary. Anterior chin thickness was negatively correlated with the sagittal diameter of the laryngopharynx upper boundary (r = -0.211, P<0.05). Chin depression was negatively correlated with the sagittal diameter of the laryngopharynx lower boundary (r = -0.237, P<0.05). Chin curvature was positively correlated with the transverse diameter of the laryngopharynx lower boundary (r = 0.231, P<0.05).

Conclusion

Patients with skeletal Class Ⅱ mandibular retraction exhibit thinner chins. The sagittal position of the chin is backward, and the vertical position is upward. Patients with skeletal Class Ⅱ mandibular retraction have a narrow glossopharyngeal airway. There is a correlation between the morphology and position of the chin and the morphology of the upper airway in patients with Class Ⅱ mandibular retraction.

CLC number: R78 Document code: A Article ID: 2096-1456(2024)11-0863-08

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases
Pages 863-870

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
YUAN Y, HAN W, ZHEN L, et al. Study of the characteristics and correlation of the chin and airway in skeletal Class Ⅱ adult female patients with mandibular retraction. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2024, 32(11): 863-870. https://doi.org/10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.202440284

843

Views

4

Downloads

0

Crossref

1

Scopus

Received: 28 July 2024
Revised: 10 October 2024
Published: 20 November 2024
© 2024 by Editorial Department of Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases