Discover the SciOpen Platform and Achieve Your Research Goals with Ease.
Search articles, authors, keywords, DOl and etc.
To explore the characteristics and correlation of the chin and airway in females with skeletal Class Ⅱ mandibular retraction for reference for clinical diagnosis and therapy.
This study was approved by the hospital Medical Ethics Committee. Forty cases of skeletal Class Ⅱ mandibular retraction adult females with average angle were selected as the research group, and sixty cases of skeletal Class Ⅰ patients with average angle were selected as the control group. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images for all subjects were analyzed using threedimensional modeling software. Measurements included the chin morphology, position, and upper airway morphology.
Compared with skeletal Class Ⅰ patients, patients with skeletal Class Ⅱ mandibular retraction had smaller anterior chin thickness, base bone volume, chin total volume, and larger chin angle, chin depression, chin curvature, and alveolar area with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). Gn-V, Gn-H, Po-NB distance, and facial angle were smaller, and the Y-axis angle was larger in patients with skeletal Class Ⅱ mandibular retraction with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). Upper airway total volume, transverse and sagittal diameter of the glossopharynx upper boundary were smaller in patients with skeletal Class Ⅱ mandibular retraction with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). The correlation analysis between the morphology and position of the chin and the morphology of the upper airway in patients with Class Ⅱ mandibular retraction showed that there was a negative correlation between chin angle and laryngopharynx length in patients with Class Ⅱ mandibular retraction (r = -0.277, P<0.01). There was a negative correlation between Po-NB distance and palatopharyngeal length (r = -0.222, P<0.05). Chin height (r = -0.261, P<0.01) and basal bone area (r = -0.225, P<0.05) were negatively correlated with the transverse diameter of the palatopharyngeal upper boundary.The minimum chin thickness (r = 0.245, P<0.05), chin angle (r = 0.249, P<0.05), and alveolar area (r = 0.213, P<0.05) were positively correlated with the sagittal diameter of the palatopharyngeal upper boundary. Gn-V (r = 0.217, P<0.05) and Po-NB distance (r = 0.208, P<0.05) were positively correlated with the transverse diameter of the glossopharynx upper boundary. Anterior chin thickness was negatively correlated with the sagittal diameter of the laryngopharynx upper boundary (r = -0.211, P<0.05). Chin depression was negatively correlated with the sagittal diameter of the laryngopharynx lower boundary (r = -0.237, P<0.05). Chin curvature was positively correlated with the transverse diameter of the laryngopharynx lower boundary (r = 0.231, P<0.05).
Patients with skeletal Class Ⅱ mandibular retraction exhibit thinner chins. The sagittal position of the chin is backward, and the vertical position is upward. Patients with skeletal Class Ⅱ mandibular retraction have a narrow glossopharyngeal airway. There is a correlation between the morphology and position of the chin and the morphology of the upper airway in patients with Class Ⅱ mandibular retraction.
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Comments on this article