AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (6.6 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Expert Consensus | Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Accuracy of digital guided implant surgery: expert consensus on nonsurgical factors and their treatments

Shulan XU1Ping LI1Shuo YANG1Shaobing LI1Haibin LU1Andi ZHU1Lishu HUANG2Jinming WANG3Shitong XU4Liping WANG5Chunbo TANG6Yanmin ZHOU7Lei ZHOU8( )
Dental implant Center, Stomatological Hospital, School of Stomatology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510280, China
Macau Weiyu Dental Medical Center, Macao Special Administrative Region 999078, China
Department of Implantology, Guanghua School of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510000, China
Guangzhou Ruitai Dental Hospital, Guangzhou 510000, China
Department of Implantology, Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510000, China
Dental implant Center, Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China
Dental implant Center, Hospital of Stomatological,Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
Taikang Bybo Dental Group Co.,Ltd., Guangzhou 510000, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

The standardized workflow of computer-aided static guided implant surgery includes preoperative examination, data acquisition, guide design, guide fabrication and surgery. Errors may occur at each step, leading to irreversible cumulative effects and thus impacting the accuracy of implant placement. However, clinicians tend to focus on factors causing errors in surgical operations, ignoring the possibility of irreversible errors in nonstandard guided surgery. Based on the clinical practice of domestic experts and research progress at home and abroad, this paper summarizes the sources of errors in guided implant surgery from the perspectives of preoperative inspection, data collection, guide designing and manufacturing and describes strategies to resolve errors so as to gain expert consensus. Consensus recom-mendation: 1. Preoperative considerations: the appropriate implant guide type should be selected according to the patient′s oral condition before surgery, and a retaining screw-assisted support guide should be selected if necessary. 2. Data acquisition should be standardized as much as possible, including beam CT and extraoral scanning. CBCT performed with the patient′s head fixed and with a small field of view is recommended. For patients with metal prostheses inside the mouth, a registration marker guide should be used, and the ambient temperature and light of the external oral scanner should be reasonably controlled. 3. Optimization of computer-aided design: it is recommended to select a handleguided planting system and a closed metal sleeve and to register images by overlapping markers. Properly designing the retaining screws, extending the support structure of the guide plate and increasing the length of the guide section are methods to feasibly reduce the incidence of surgical errors. 4. Improving computer-aided production: it is also crucial to set the best printing parameters according to different printing technologies and to choose the most appropriate postprocessing procedures.

CLC number: R78 Document code: A Article ID: 2096-1456(2024)05-0321-09

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases
Pages 321-329

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
XU S, LI P, YANG S, et al. Accuracy of digital guided implant surgery: expert consensus on nonsurgical factors and their treatments. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2024, 32(5): 321-329. https://doi.org/10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2024.05.001

1111

Views

33

Downloads

0

Crossref

2

Scopus

Received: 27 April 2023
Revised: 28 October 2023
Published: 20 May 2024
© 2024 by Editorial Department of Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases