AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (13.9 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Basic Study | Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Effects of different pretreatment agents on primary tooth dentin bonding durability

Endi LIUJing LVYingqun LIUXing'ai JIN( )
The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Department of Pediatrics, School of Stomatology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150000, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Objective

To explore the effects of different pretreatment agents on primary tooth dentin bonding durability.

Methods

Forty-two retained primary molars were selected, 24 of which were cut along the mesial and distal directions; thus, 48 samples were obtained for shear bond strength tests, and the other 18 teeth were used for nanoleakage tests. According to different pretreatments, both experimental samples were divided randomly into three groups (Group A: distilled water pretreatment group; Group B: 2% chlorhexidine pretreatment group; Group C: 10 mg/mL resveratrol pretreatment group). The test specimens were prepared, the shear bond strength was tested, and interfacial nanoleakage evaluation and scanning electron microscope observation were performed to evaluate the effects of different pretreatment agents on the bonding interface immediately and after aging for one hour with 10% sodium hypochlorite aqueous solution.

Results

The immediate shear bond strength results showed that there was no significant difference among the three test groups. After aging, the shear bond strength of Group C was significantly higher than that of Group A and Group B (P<0.05). After aging, the shear bond strength of Group A was significantly lower than the immediate shear bond strength (P<0.05), whereas there was no significant difference in shear bond strength before and after aging in Group B and Group C (P>0.05). For Group C, there was no significant difference in interfacial nanoleakage before and after aging. In addition, among the three groups, Group C had the lowest interfacial nanoleakage (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Both chlorhexidine and resveratrol pretreatment can improve the adhesion durability of deciduous dentin, but the effects of resveratrol are better than those of chlorhexidine.

CLC number: R78 Document code: A Article ID: 2096-1456(2022)07-0475-08

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases
Pages 475-482

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
LIU E, LV J, LIU Y, et al. Effects of different pretreatment agents on primary tooth dentin bonding durability. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2022, 30(7): 475-482. https://doi.org/10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2022.07.003

110

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

4

Scopus

Received: 09 December 2021
Revised: 27 December 2021
Published: 20 July 2022
© 2022 by Editorial Department of Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases