AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (2.7 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Clinical Study | Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Clinical efficacy evaluation of minimally invasive periodontal therapy assisted by endoscopy

Department of Periodontal, Nanjing Stomatological Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, China
Department of Periodontal, Suzhou Stomatological Hospital, Suzhou 215008, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the clinical effect of periodontal endoscope-assisted scaling and root planing (SRP) in treating advanced periodontitis.

Methods

Nineteen cases of grade Ⅲ and Ⅳ periodontitis selected from June 2017 to January 2019 in the Nanjing Stomatological Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University were divided into the periodontal endoscope and control groups. In the periodontal endoscope group, SRP was performed under a periodontal microscope in one treatment after initial supragingival scaling; in the control group, SRP was performed under regular conditions, and additional SRP was conducted in positive bleeding on probing sites twice every other week as needed. Periodontal status, including probing depth (PD), bleeding on probing (BOP) and attachment loss (AL), was recorded by a Florida probe.

Results

For sites of 4<PD ≤ 6 mm, there was no significant difference in PD-and BOP-positive rates or AL between the two groups at baseline. The PD-and BOP-positive rates and AL in the endoscope group and control group decreased significantly from baseline at 3 and 6 months. PD in the endoscope group was smaller than that in the control group at 3 months (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups at 6 months (P >0.05). There was no significant difference in the BOP positive rate or AL change between the two groups at 3 months and 6 months (P > 0.05). For sites with PD > 6 mm, at baseline, the positive rates of PD, BOP and AL in the endoscope group were more serious than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant. The PD-and BOP-positive rates and AL in the endoscope group and control group decreased significantly from baseline at 3 and 6 months. However, PD in the endoscope group became shallower than that in the control group (P < 0.05) after 3 and 6 months. There was no significant difference in the BOP positive rate or AL between the two groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

When compared to regular SRP, periodontal microscope-assisted SRP achieves better improvement in PD and is more beneficial for reducing the BOP and AL of deeper sites.

CLC number: R78 Document code: A Article ID: 2096-1456(2021)03-0171-07

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases
Pages 171-177

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
XIA J, LI H. Clinical efficacy evaluation of minimally invasive periodontal therapy assisted by endoscopy. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2021, 29(3): 171-177. https://doi.org/10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2021.03.005

4

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

Received: 28 November 2019
Revised: 16 August 2020
Published: 20 March 2021
© 2021 by Editorial Department of Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases