AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.8 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Basic Study | Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Finite element analysis of the stress distribution of dental implant crowns with different all-ceramic materials and thicknesses

Jiesen LI1Zhenxiang LIN2Dong WU1Zhiqiang ZHENG1Jie LIN1( )
Department of VIP Dental Service, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350002, China
Department of Stomatology, Hospital of Fujian Provincial Authorities, Fuzhou 350001, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Objective

To compare the stress distribution of different all-ceramic restoration materials and thicknesses in dental crown restorations using the finite element method and provide a reference for the selection and design of clinical crown restoration materials.

Methods

A finite element model of mandibular first molar implant crown restoration was created, and 6 crown thickness designs and 4 different crown restoration materials were evaluated, namely, resin-based ceramics (Lava Ultimate and Vita Enamic), lithium disilicate glass-ceramics (IPS e.max CAD), and zirconia ceramic (Cercon) designs. The mandibular first molars were loaded at 600 N, and the stress distribution was analyzed by using the finite element software ANSYS 10.0.

Results

The crown stress analysis showed that 156.05 MPa was the highest in 4 mm Cercon group and 18.85 MPa was the lowest in 1 mm Lava Ultimate group. The stress analysis of resin cement showed that 62.52 MPa was the highest in the 4 mm Lava Ultimate group and 16.74 MPa was the lowest in 1 mm IPS e.max CAD group. During the use of the finished platform, the stress concentration of the Lava Ultimate group in the crown prosthesis and resin cement was higher than that of the personalized platform with the same crown thickness.

Conclusion

With increasing crown thickness, the maximum principal stress concentration in crown restoration and resin cement increases. Personalized abutments are more conducive to reducing stress concentrations for resin-based ceramics.

CLC number: R78 Document code: A Article ID: 2096-1456(2021)03-0166-05

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases
Pages 166-170

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
LI J, LIN Z, WU D, et al. Finite element analysis of the stress distribution of dental implant crowns with different all-ceramic materials and thicknesses. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2021, 29(3): 166-170. https://doi.org/10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2021.03.004

122

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

3

Scopus

Received: 09 March 2020
Revised: 11 May 2020
Published: 20 March 2021
© 2021 by Editorial Department of Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases