AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.6 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Prevention and Treatment Practice | Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Maxillofacial connective tissue hyperplastic trichoepithelioma: report of two cases and a literature review

Junwei WU1Junfa ZHENG2( )Xin YAN1XuXuan DING1
Foshan Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital Oral Medicine Center, Foshan 528000, China
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Stomatology Hospital, Southern Medical Univerisity, Guangzhou 510280, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the diagnosis and clinical treatment of maxillofacial connective tissue hyperplastic trichoepithelioma.

Methods

The clinical data of two cases of maxillofacial connective tissue hyperplastic trichoepithelioma were summarized and analyzed along with the literature.

Results

Two cases of maxillofacial connective tissue hyperplastic trichoepithelioma were male, aged 21 and 30 years. The clinical manifestations were painless pale brown and pale white plaques in the maxillofacial region. The lesion was tough and clear, with no ulcers in the middle depression. The course was 10-16 months, with 1-3 months before medical treatment, and the tumor had a significant history of enlargement. After surgery, the skin was cut 3 mm along the outer circumference of the tumor, and local tissue defects were repaired by the adjacent flap. The pathological report showed that the tumor cells were located in the dermis, and were striped, trabecular or nested. The tiny sac contained fibrous connective tissue proliferation. The tumor cells were amorphous without obvious nuclear division. Immunohistochemical analysis reported bcl-2(-), CK7(-), CK19(-), CD34(+), P63(+), CK56(+), and Ki67(±). The pathological diagnosis was connective tissue proliferative hair epithelial tumor. The patient was followed up for 24 months. There was no recurrence of the tumor, no obvious scarring, and no deformity or dysfunction of the maxillofacial region.

Conclusion

Pathological and immunohistochemical examination is the basis for the differential diagnosis of maxillofacial connective tissue hyperplastic trichoepithelioma, and surgical removal of tumors is an effective treatment.

CLC number: R782 Document code: A Article ID: 2096-1456(2021)02-0106-04

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases
Pages 106-109

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
WU J, ZHENG J, YAN X, et al. Maxillofacial connective tissue hyperplastic trichoepithelioma: report of two cases and a literature review. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2021, 29(2): 106-109. https://doi.org/10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2021.02.006

91

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

Received: 19 July 2020
Revised: 20 October 2020
Published: 20 February 2021
© 2021 by Editorial Department of Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases