AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (4.5 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Basic Study | Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Effect of two aging methods on the bonding interface between glass ceramics and dentin

Shanxi Medical University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Taiyuan 030012, China
Department of Prosthodontics, Affiliated People's Hospital, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030012, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Objective

To study the effects of bacterial invasion and artificial saliva immersion on the bond strength and nanoleakage between healthy dentin and glass ceramics-bonded specimens using three types of resin cements and provide a reference for the selection of clinical bonding materials.

Methods

One hundred eight dentin blocks were selected to prepare bonded specimens with Variolink N, Multilink N, RelyX Unicem and glass ceramics blocks. The adhesive specimens of each type of resin cements were divided into three groups according to the aging method: bacterial invasiveness group (the specimens were cultured under anaerobic conditions for 14 days after inoculation with Streptococcus mutans), artificial saliva immersion group (the specimens were immersed in artificial saliva for 6 months), and control group (the immediate test group). Each group comprised 12 specimens: 6 were selected to test the bonding strength, and 6 were observed by scanning field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM).

Results

The bond strength of Variolink N in the immediate test group was significantly higher than that of Multilink N and RelyX Unicem, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). However, no significant difference was found in the bacterial invasiveness group and artificial saliva immersion group (P > 0.05). In the bacterial invasion group, the difference in the nanoleakage of the three adhesives was statistically significant (P < 0.05), with a trend of Variolink N > Multilink N > RelyX Unicem, and pairwise comparison was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The nanoleakage of the three resin adhesives showed an increasing trend in the bacterial invasion group and artificial saliva group compared with that of the immediate test group.

Conclusion

Both artificial saliva soaking and bacterial invasion can reduce the sealing property of the adhesive interface of 3 types of resin cements to different degrees. The presence of Streptococcus mutans in the oral cavity may reduce the sealing performance of the resin dentine adhesive interface.

CLC number: R783.4 Document code: A Article ID: 2096-1456(2019)11-0703-08

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases
Pages 703-710

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
WU Z, LI F. Effect of two aging methods on the bonding interface between glass ceramics and dentin. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2019, 27(11): 703-710. https://doi.org/10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2019.11.004

106

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

1

Scopus

Received: 14 May 2019
Revised: 10 June 2019
Published: 20 November 2019
© 2019 by Editorial Department of Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases