AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.1 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Indication selection and efficacy analysis of condylar fracture

Jia LI1Zhaochen DAN1Yanmin SONG1Yaju WANG1Wenzhang GE2Wei TANG3( )
Beijing Stomatological Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
Jinan Stomatologic Hospital, Ji'nan 250001, China
State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & Dept. of Trauma Plastic Surgery & West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Objective

The present study examined the effects of surgical and conservative treatment on the curative effect of patients with condylar fracture to determine the best treatment scheme and indication.

Methods

A total of 339 clinical cases of condylar fracture were selected, and pain severity, degree of mouth opening, angle of condylar fracture (calculated as the difference in the angle of the condylar between the fractured side and uninjured side) and the height of the mandibular ramus (calculated as the difference in the height of the mandibular ramus between the fractured side and uninjured side) of patients at admission were measured and analyzed. The effects of surgical treatment (rigid internal fixation) and conservative treatment (functional therapy) were evaluated and compared 6 months after treatment.

Results

Among the patients with a condylar fracture displacement angle ≥ 11.50°, Significantly more (χ2 = 26.38, P < 0.05) patients exhibited good recovery 6 months after surgical treatment [69.4% (118/170)] than those after conservative treatment [35.4% (29/82)]. Among the patients with a condylar fracture displacement angle < 11.50°, there was not a significant difference (χ2 = 0.55, P > 0.05) between the numbers of patients who exhibited good recovery 6 months after surgical treatment [52.4% (22/42)] and conservative treatment [44.4% (20/45)]. Among the patients with mandibular ramus height ≥ 4.19 mm, significantly more (χ2 = 20.35, P < 0.05) patients exhibited good recovery 6 months after surgical treatment [64.7% (112/173)] compared with those after conservative treatment [35.6% (32/90)]. Among the patients with mandibular ramus height < 4.19 mm, there was not a significant difference (χ2 = 0.21, P > 0.05) between the numbers of patients who exhibited good recovery 6 months after surgical treatment [46.7% (14/30)] and conservative treatment [41.3% (19/46)].

Conclusion

Patients with a displacement angle of condyle fracture greater than 11.50° and a mandibular ramus height less than 4.19 mm exhibit the greatest pain and a better effect from surgical treatment than those from conservative treatment.

CLC number: R782 Document code: A Article ID: 2096-1456(2018)09-0569-05

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases
Pages 569-573

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
LI J, DAN Z, SONG Y, et al. Indication selection and efficacy analysis of condylar fracture. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2018, 26(9): 569-573. https://doi.org/10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2018.09.005

4

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

Received: 27 August 2017
Revised: 05 March 2018
Published: 20 September 2018
© 2018 by Editorial Department of Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases