AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Powered by AMiner. Clicking this button will take you away from SciOpen.
Home Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases Article
PDF (1.1 MB)
Cite
EndNote(RIS) BibTeX
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

A study of the esthetic outcomes of peri-implant soft tissue conditioning with provisional restorations and healing abutments

Senqing LIU, Ruitian DU, Hongwen LI( ), Xiaorui GENG, Yunting FU, Fayun GENG
Department of Stomatology, Shenzhen Longgang District Ear Nose and Throat Hospital, Shenzhen Institute of Ear Nose and Throat, Shenzhen 518172, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Objective

To compare the esthetic outcomes of peri-implant soft tissue conditioning with provisional restorations and healing abutments.

Methods

A total of 48 patients missing a single tooth in the esthetic zone were chosen for the present study and divided into two groups. Twenty-six patients in Group A used provisional restorations to condition the peri-implant soft tissue before final restorations, while 22 patients in Group B used healing abutments to condition the soft tissue. All patients were evaluated by pink esthetic scores (PESs) at the time of the final restoration and at a 1-year follow-up.

Results

A total of 26 implants in Group A and 22 implants in Group B showed good peri-implant soft tissue condition. PESs at the time of the final restoration and at the 1-year follow-up in Group A were 8.18 and 8.35, respectively, and 6.73 and 8.18 in Group B, respectively. PESs at the time of final restoration and at the 1-year follow-up were not significantly different in Group A but were significantly different in Group B. The PESs of the two groups were significantly different at the final restoration but were not significantly different at the 1-year follow-up.

Conclusions

Provisional restoration in the esthetic zone can improve the pink esthetic effect when permanent restoration.

Keywords

Implant restorationProvisional restorationHealing abutmentEsthetic zoneEsthetic outcomes
CLC number: R782.12 Document code: A Article ID: 2096-1456(2018)06-0379-05

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Crossref Google Scholar
Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases
Volume 26 Issue 6,
June 2018
Pages 379-383
DOI: 10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2018.06.008

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Cite this Report
Close
Close
Cite this article:
LIU S, DU R, LI H, et al. A study of the esthetic outcomes of peri-implant soft tissue conditioning with provisional restorations and healing abutments. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2018, 26(6): 379-383. https://doi.org/10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2018.06.008

6

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus
Received: 19 November 2017
Revised: 11 January 2018
Published: 20 June 2018
© 2018 by Editorial Department of Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.