AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (880.3 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

The clinical and bacteriological analysis of the diabetic with oral and maxillofacial space infections

Shanshan YU1,2Tao LI3Gang DONG3Fengmei LI3Jianjin ZHENG3( )
Department of Stomatology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266011, China
Qingdao Labsys Xindu Stomatological Hospital, Qingdao 266000, China
Department of Stomatology Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao 266011, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Objective

To analyze the clinical characteristics of oral and maxillofacial space infection between the diabetic and non-diabetic patients and to explore the common pathogenic bacteria and antibiotic sensitivity of diabetic patients, to guide the clinical medication.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted on 61 patients who received treatment in Qingdao municipal hospital affiliated to Qingdao university, between December 2014 and December 2016 with Oral and maxillofacial space infection. The 61 patients were divided into diabetic group and non-diabetic group. The research contented the patients’age, sex, source of infection, pathogenic bacteria, antibacterial drugs sensitivity, fasting blood glucose levels, white blood cell total and neutrophils percentage, and days of hospitalization. T test and chi-square test in SASS.19.0 software was used.

Results

In the 2 groups of patients, the most common etiological factor was odontogenic infection; the most easiest affected space was submandibular space. The most common pathogenic bacteria were streptococcus. Vancomycin was the most sensitive drug, then levofloxacin and cefotaxime. In addition, the diabetes patients’age, fasting blood glucose levels and hospitalization days were significantly higher than non-diabetic patients’.

Conclusion

For the diabetic patients with maxillofacial space infection, levofloxacin and cefotaxime was first used for the conservative treatments when the results of the bacterial culture and drug susceptibility test are not obtained. Meanwhile, according to the oral and maxillofacial anatomy, combination of anti-anaerobic agents such as Tinidazole is also suggested. But the final situation of medication is based on the result of the drug susceptibility test.

CLC number: R782 Document code: A Article ID: 2096-1456(2018)01-0043-05

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases
Pages 43-47

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
YU S, LI T, DONG G, et al. The clinical and bacteriological analysis of the diabetic with oral and maxillofacial space infections. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2018, 26(1): 43-47. https://doi.org/10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2018.01.008

8

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

Received: 15 December 2016
Revised: 17 April 2017
Published: 20 January 2018
© 2018 by Editorial Department of Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases