AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (3 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Comparative study on the influence of two kinds of different self-locking brackets on the dental arch shape change in non-extraction patients

Ai-qing LIU1, Zao CHEN1, Ji-dong ZHANG2( ), Qiang YUAN3
Department of Stomatology, Zhongshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine of Guangdong Province, Zhongshan 528400, China
Department of Stomatology, Hospital of Torch Development Zone, Zhongshan 528400, China
Department of Stomatology, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical College, Baotou 014032, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Objective

By analyzing changes of dental arch width and length during the aligning and leveling period (non-extraction case) with two kinds of self-locking bracket, compare the difference between the active self-locking bracket with the passive bracket.

Methods

The data of dental arch perimeter change amount and dental arch width and length change amount (WU/L3, WU/L4, WU/L5, WU/L6, U/LL) were statistically analyzed using the correlation and regression method by comparing active and passive brackets for the correction of dental arch variations. Two different brackets for the correction of the measured values of the dental arch variations was analyzed by t-test.

Results

There were statistical relationships between the amount of arch perimeter increase and the amount of width and length increase. The regression equation was statistically significant (P < 0.05), It was greater impacted arch width increase to arch perimeter in the self-locking. The t-test results showed WU3, WL3, WL6, LR 4 measured values (P < 0.05) statistically significant in the active self-locking group and passive group.

Conclusion

Active and passive self-locking bracket have good arch expansion effecting. The active self-locking bracket is slightly dominant than the passive bracket in the expansion of the canine width whereas the active self-locking bracket is better than the passive in the expansion of the mandibular first molar and arch perimeter which should be widely applied to the appropriate cases.

CLC number: R783.5 Document code: A Article ID: 2096-1456(2017)02-105-05

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases
Pages 105-109

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
LIU A-q, CHEN Z, ZHANG J-d, et al. Comparative study on the influence of two kinds of different self-locking brackets on the dental arch shape change in non-extraction patients. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2017, 25(2): 105-109. https://doi.org/10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2017.02.008

378

Views

1

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

Received: 14 January 2016
Revised: 06 April 2016
Published: 20 February 2017
© 2017 by Editorial Department of Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases