AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (829.7 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Prevention and Treatment Practice | Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Clinical comparison of magnetic attachment and ball-cap attachment in the complete denture restoration on mandibular edentulous jaw

De-cheng RUAN( ), Min MA
Jiangmen Stomatological Hospital, Jiangmen 529000, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Objective

To compare the clinical effect of magnetic attachment and ball-cap attachment in implant rehabilitation in mandibular edentulous patients.

Methods

128 mandibular edentulous were divided into A, B two groups according to double-blind randomization. There were 64 people in each group. Subjects in group A and B received routine oral examination, panoramic radiograph to establish the model of alveolar bone and make restoration plan. The magnetic attachment was applied in patients of group A in restoration treatment, while ball-cap attachment was used in group B. Patients of both groups were recalled a year later, and the periodontal tissue health and satisfaction were evaluated. The periodontal tissue health was examined according to clinical standards.

Results

The gingival health status of group A and B showed significant differences (P = 0.00), The gingival health status of group A was better than group B. The mobility was also analyzed. The results showed that group A was better than group B in mobility of abutments (P = 0.003), There was no significant difference (χ2 = 1.875, P> 0.05) in aesthetics. There was significant difference (P<0.05) between two groups in fixity, chewing ability and comfortability. Group A were better than group B.

Conclusion

The magnetic attachment shows better performance in implant retention and protects the health of periodontal tissue, which make patients feel more comfortable and satisfied.

CLC number: R783.1 Document code: A Article ID: 2096-1456(2016)11-674-03

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases
Pages 674-676

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
RUAN D-c, MA M. Clinical comparison of magnetic attachment and ball-cap attachment in the complete denture restoration on mandibular edentulous jaw. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2016, 24(11): 674-676. https://doi.org/10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2016.11.011

321

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

Received: 17 March 2016
Revised: 11 May 2016
Published: 20 November 2016
© 2016 by Editorial Department of Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases