Discover the SciOpen Platform and Achieve Your Research Goals with Ease.
Search articles, authors, keywords, DOl and etc.
To compare the clinical effect of magnetic attachment and ball-cap attachment in implant rehabilitation in mandibular edentulous patients.
128 mandibular edentulous were divided into A, B two groups according to double-blind randomization. There were 64 people in each group. Subjects in group A and B received routine oral examination, panoramic radiograph to establish the model of alveolar bone and make restoration plan. The magnetic attachment was applied in patients of group A in restoration treatment, while ball-cap attachment was used in group B. Patients of both groups were recalled a year later, and the periodontal tissue health and satisfaction were evaluated. The periodontal tissue health was examined according to clinical standards.
The gingival health status of group A and B showed significant differences (P = 0.00), The gingival health status of group A was better than group B. The mobility was also analyzed. The results showed that group A was better than group B in mobility of abutments (P = 0.003), There was no significant difference (χ2 = 1.875, P> 0.05) in aesthetics. There was significant difference (P<0.05) between two groups in fixity, chewing ability and comfortability. Group A were better than group B.
The magnetic attachment shows better performance in implant retention and protects the health of periodontal tissue, which make patients feel more comfortable and satisfied.
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Comments on this article