AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.2 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Basic Study | Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Effect of three resin cement on fracture strength of cemented machinable glass ceramic

Hong HUANG1Peng ZHANGRi-zhao LI( )
Nanfang Stomatological Hospital of Zhanjiang, Zhanjiang 524005, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the effect of three different resin cement on fracture strength of cemented machinable IPS e.max CAD specimens and provide guides for clinical luting procedure.

Methods

Sixty human molars were collected, and occlusal enamel were removed; IPS e. max CAD blocks were processed into plate-shape and etched with 9.5% hydrofluoric acid. All specimens were randomly divided into three groups (n = 20) and received there different luting treatments, (group A: Multilink® N+ Monobonds-S, group B: RelyXTM Ultimate+ ScotchbondTM adhesive, group C: RelyXTM Unicem 2). Then each group were divided into two sub-groups (group 1: the control group, group 2 received thermal cycling). Fracture load was measured with a universal testing machine. The results were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and LSD test.

Results

Fracture load of each group were A1(1763 ± 128)N、A2(1563 ± 115)N、B1(1861 ±135)N、B2(1676 ± 137)N、C1(1446 ± 153)N、C2(1038 ± 95)N. Significant differences of fracture load were observed among all groups (F = 52.279, P<0.001). Resin cement (F = 94.104, P<0.001) and thermal cycling (F = 63.818, P<0.001) affected the fracture load significantly. LSD test showed that significant differences of fracture load were observed among group A, B and C (P<0.05). Group B illustrated the highest fracture load where as group C demonstrated the lowest one.

Conclusion

Resin cement that treats the ceramic and dentin surface simultaneously will strengthen the fracture load of the glass ceramic. Thermal cycling will reduce the fracture strength of cemented glass ceramic.

CLC number: R783.3 Document code: A Article ID: 2096-1456(2016)06-341-04

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases
Pages 341-344

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
HUANG H, ZHANG P, LI R-z. Effect of three resin cement on fracture strength of cemented machinable glass ceramic. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2016, 24(6): 341-344. https://doi.org/10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2016.06.005

246

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

Received: 18 January 2016
Revised: 02 March 2016
Published: 20 June 2016
© 2016 by Editorial Department of Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases