AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1,020.5 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese

Research progress in modeling and intelligent control of anaerobic fermentation processes for agricultural wastes

Huan Zhang1, Liangheng Wu1, Chenxi Xia2, Xueting Zhang2, Quanguo Zhang1,2
College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450046, China
Research Institute of Modern Agricultural Engineering, Huanghe Science and Technology University, Zhengzhou 450006, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Anaerobic fermentation converts crop residues, livestock manure, and other agricultural wastes into energy-rich products, particularly methane and hydrogen, simultaneously enabling waste treatment and resource recovery. However, stable operation and industrial scale-up remain difficult because feedstock properties, microbial metabolism, fluid behavior, and mass transfer vary continuously throughout fermentation. Their interactions generate nonlinear, time-varying, and multiscale dynamics that are difficult to observe, predict, and regulate using conventional methods. This review synthesizes progress in modeling and intelligent control for the anaerobic fermentation of agricultural wastes, with particular attention to biochemical hydrogen production. The reviewed advances are organized around a hierarchical data-mechanism-control framework that connects process characterization, hybrid modeling, online estimation, optimization, and system-level decision support. First, the review examines heterogeneous data generated during feedstock characterization, pretreatment, reactor operation, microbial conversion, and product formation. Laboratory and pilot-scale datasets are often sparse, noisy, imbalanced, and dependent on specific feedstocks or reactor configurations. Second, the review compares major modeling strategies and clarifies their respective roles. Random forests and support vector machines are effective for modeling feedstock characteristics and pretreatment responses, whereas artificial neural networks and long short-term memory networks are capable of capturing nonlinear relationships and temporal dependencies. Gaussian process regression supports uncertainty analysis under limited data, while transfer learning can reuse information across related feedstocks or operating scenarios. Despite these capabilities, purely data-driven models may generate unreliable predictions outside their training domains and may violate conservation laws, thermodynamic constraints, or microbial kinetics. Mechanistic models, including anaerobic digestion model No. 1 (ADM1), provide interpretable process descriptions but require extensive calibration and may inadequately represent complex slurry transport and microbial succession. Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) provide a gray-box modeling approach by embedding conservation relationships and microbial kinetic equations into the learning objective. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), particularly SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), complements this approach by identifying influential variables, interactions, inhibitory conditions, and potential process thresholds. These tools can translate model outputs into operationally meaningful evidence for process diagnosis and control, although their reliability under practical operating conditions remains to be validated in reactors treating agricultural wastes. Third, the review links hybrid modeling to closed-loop process control. Internet of things (IoT) sensor networks and edge computing can support local filtering, drift correction, feature extraction, communication management, and rapid fault detection. Soft sensors can estimate difficult-to-measure state variables, including volatile fatty acids, chemical oxygen demand, alkalinity, and microbial activity, from readily available online measurements. Multi-objective optimization and model predictive control (MPC) can then balance gas productivity, process stability, and energy consumption while satisfying equipment and safety constraints. At the system level, digital twins integrate biochemical kinetics, computational fluid dynamics, sensor data, equipment models, and scenario simulation. Nevertheless, applications in agricultural waste fermentation remain largely conceptual or limited to individual components because biological and hydrodynamic processes are difficult to couple efficiently. Future research should prioritize standardized multimodal databases, shared biochemical and hydrodynamic model libraries, adaptive hybrid models, robust sensing, uncertainty-aware control, and integrated device-edge-cloud architectures. Progress in these areas can advance interpretable prediction, resilient process operation, and reliable bioenergy recovery, thereby supporting the digital and intelligent transformation of agricultural waste management systems.

CLC number: TK6 Document code: A Article ID: 1002-6819(2026)-15-0001-10

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering
Pages 1-10

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Zhang H, Wu L, Xia C, et al. Research progress in modeling and intelligent control of anaerobic fermentation processes for agricultural wastes. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2026, 42(15): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.202603276

3

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Received: 31 March 2026
Revised: 19 June 2026
Published: 15 August 2026
© Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering 2026