AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.4 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese

Evolutionary characteristics, driving logic, and system optimization of the scaled agribusiness operation policies in China

Feifei LIN1, Xuesong KONG1( ), Peng CHENG2
School of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China
School of Management, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan 430205, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Scale agribusiness operation has been one of the most important pathways to advance agricultural and rural modernization. This study aims to explore the evolution patterns, dynamic logic, and system optimization of scale agribusiness operations in China. Data was collected from the 1 130 national documents from 1984 to 2024. Text analysis was conducted using natural language processing. The “goals–tools” perspective was integrated with historical institutionalism. A composite framework was constructed to examine stage-specific characteristics, driving logic, and structural composition of policy evolution in scale agribusiness operations. Optimization strategies were finally proposed for the future. The results show that: 1) Three stages were divided during policy evolution: initial exploration, nationwide implementation, and optimization and refinement. Policy goals shifted from localized pilots under stable land-contract relations to nationwide promotion and system construction, and later to policy optimization around smallholder modernization and contracted-land fragmentation governance. 2) Policy evolution was attributed to the combined effects of institutional contexts, ideas, and individuals. A dynamic logic was characterized by institutional lock-in under the path dependence of the household contract responsibility, critical breakthroughs under the impacts of globalization and urbanization, and gradual adaptation under the practical constraints of a “large country with smallholder farming”. 3) The current policy system consisted of three modules—farmland transfer, service linkage, and land consolidation—and four supporting modules—industrialized operation, talent cultivation, fiscal and financial support, as well as technological innovation. It was necessary to integrate engineering consolidation with the land rights for the governance of farmland fragmentation. Socialized service systems and agricultural machinery support should be strengthened to realize the scale benefits of contiguous farmland operations. Policy tools were then allocated in a differentiated manner, according to regional resource endowments and engineering conditions. Diversified pathways can be expected for scale agribusiness operations. According to the long-term texts, the policy evolution patterns of scale agribusiness can provide a strong reference to promote agricultural modernization in the background of a “large country with smallholder farming”.

CLC number: F321.1 Document code: A Article ID: 1002-6819(2026)-11-0373-11

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering
Pages 373-383

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
LIN F, KONG X, CHENG P. Evolutionary characteristics, driving logic, and system optimization of the scaled agribusiness operation policies in China. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2026, 42(11): 373-383. https://doi.org/10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.202511171

2

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Received: 21 November 2025
Revised: 22 May 2026
Published: 15 June 2026
© Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering 2026