AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (2.2 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese

Optimization of irrigation regimes in salinized farmland based on soil water-salt transport and sunflower growth response

Yuting SHI1Wei YANG1,2( )Zhongyi QU1,3Ruxin ZHANG1Erzhen LI4Xiaomin ZHANG1Shaodong YANG5Wentao JI1Jianjie QIN3
College of Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China
College of Grassland Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University / Key Laboratory of Grassland Resources, Ministry of Education, Hohhot 010011, China
School of Energy and Environment, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Baotou 014010, China
Wuyuan Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Technology Promotion Center, Bayannur 015100, China
Jiangsu Surveying and Design Institute of Water Resources Co., Ltd., Yangzhou 225127, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Growing season irrigation can contribute to water resource in the representative large-scale arid saline irrigation area in China, such as the Hetao Irrigation District. It is very necessary to decouple the spring (non-growing season) and summer (growing season) irrigation in sustainable agriculture. Conventional practices can rely heavily on the spring flushing to leach salts, followed by disjointed summer irrigation, leading to inefficient water use. It is still unclear about soil water-salt transport patterns. This study aims to integrate these two phases into a coherent system for optimal irrigation. A systematic investigation was made to explore the synergistic effects of spring irrigation quotas and summer drip irrigation schedules on soil salinity profiles and sunflower physiology. An optimal regime was identified to balance the water conservation, salinity control, and yield stability. A field plot experiment was conducted over two consecutive years (2023–2024) at a 1 333 ha experimental station in Longxingchang Town, Wuyuan County, Inner Mongolia, China. There was the semi-arid temperate continental climate (altitude 1 022 m; mean annual temperature 6.1°C; evaporation-to-precipitation ratio >10). A split-plot design was employed to isolate the effects of the spring irrigation (Main plots: S1: 120 mm, and S2: 240 mm) and summer irrigation (Sub-plots). The treatments were compared: border irrigation (B90) against drip irrigation (D90) in 2023; Drip irrigation gradients (D90, D120, and D150) were expanded in 2024. Key parameters were measured, including the soil moisture and salt content in the 0–100 cm profile, sunflower photosynthetic parameters (LAI, Pn, Tr, and Gs), and yield components. The results revealed that there was better balance in soil-water-salt dynamics and crop performance. Soil Salinity Dynamics: The significant vertical stratification was observed in the interaction between spring flushing and summer drip irrigation in soil salinity. High spring irrigation (S2, 240 mm) with fractional drip irrigation (D120) achieved the highest desalination rate in the shallow root zone (0~40 cm). This regime exacerbated the risk of secondary salinization in the deep soil layer (>80~100 cm), where the salt content increased, due to the "piston flow" effect without adequate drainage. Conversely, drip irrigation significantly optimized the horizontal salt distribution, whereas the surface salt accumulation was reduced, compared with the border irrigation. Physiological Mechanisms: Crop physiological responses were linked to the optimal rhizosphere environment. Drip irrigation treatments maintained significantly higher leaf area index (LAI) and net photosynthetic rates (Pn) than border irrigation under identical spring irrigation. Notably, drip irrigation alleviated water stress to enhance the leaf transpiration rate (Tr), stomatal conductance (Gs), and instantaneous water use efficiency (WUE) during the grain-filling stage. The precise water delivery reduced the inhibition of cytokinin activity and root vitality under salt stress. Yield Optimization: There was a threshold effect during irrigation. While the S2 initially provided a low-salt environment, leading to the nutrient leaching and deep-layer salt stress, with an 8.2% yield penalty, compared with moderate spring irrigation. The moderate spring irrigation (S1, 120 mm) and medium drip irrigation (D90) were combined to emerge as the superior strategy. The S1 was sufficient for the desalinated seedling establishment zone (0~40 cm), while the D90 maintained the optimal moisture without the deep percolation, resulting in the highest crop water use efficiency and stable yields. The disconnection between spring and summer irrigation can be resolved for integrated production. Moderate spring irrigation (120 mm) with mulched drip irrigation (90 mm) also achieved the synergistic regulation of soil water and salt. A favorable root zone environment was formed to minimize the deep-layer salt accumulation and water wastage. Consequently, it is recommended as the standard irrigation protocol for the sustainable sunflower production in the saline-alkali lands of the Hetao Irrigation Districts.

CLC number: S275 Document code: A Article ID: 1002-6819(2026)-06-0106-11

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering
Pages 106-116

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
SHI Y, YANG W, QU Z, et al. Optimization of irrigation regimes in salinized farmland based on soil water-salt transport and sunflower growth response. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2026, 42(6): 106-116. https://doi.org/10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.202506225

159

Views

1

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

1

Scopus

Received: 28 June 2025
Revised: 13 November 2025
Published: 30 March 2026
© Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering 2026