AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (4.7 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese

Effects of fulvic acid application on drip irrigation processing tomato yield, quality, and soil nitrogen balance

Zhenpeng ZHOU1,2,3,4Zhenhua WANG1,2,3,4( )Jinzhu ZHANG1,2,3,4Wenhao LI1,2,3,4Yue WEN1,2,3,4Jiliang ZHENG1,2,3,4,5
College of Water Conservancy & Architectural Engineering, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, China
Key Laboratory of Modern Water-Saving Irrigation of Xinjiang Production & Construction Group, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, China
Technology Innovation Center for Agricultural Water and Fertilizer Efficiency Equipment of Xinjiang Production & Construction Group, Shihezi 832000, China
Key Laboratory of Northwest Oasis Water-Saving Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Shihezi 832000, China
Xinjiang Xinlianxin Energy Chemical Co., Ltd., Manas 832200, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

High nitrogen (N) application can dominate the processing of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) under drip irrigation in Xinjiang, China. The risks are associated with the low nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and significant environmental pollution. In this study, the potential of fulvic acid (FA) application was determined to mitigate these negative impacts under the prevailing high N regime. A systematic investigation was also made to evaluate the effects of the FA application rates on the soil-crop continuum under the drip irrigation. The optimal FA rate was identified to enhance the tomato yield, quality, and NUE. A field experiment was conducted over two consecutive growing seasons (2023 and 2024). Five application rates of the fulvic acid were tested as the CK (0), FA1 (10 kg/hm2), FA2 (25 kg/hm2), FA3 (50 kg/hm2), and FA4 (75 kg/hm2). All treatments received the same high rate of nitrogen fertilizer. The impacts of FA were assessed on: (1) Soil properties: Nitrate-N (NO3-N), ammonium-N (NH4+-N), total nitrogen (TN), and total carbon (TC) content in the 0~60 cm soil profile. (2) Crop growth and physiology: Plant height, stem diameter, leaf area index (LAI), aboveground biomass, leaf SPAD (soil and plant analyzer development) value (indicating chlorophyll content), and photosynthetic performance. (3) Yield and water use efficiency: Processing tomato fruit yield and irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE). (4) Fruit quality: soluble sugar, soluble solids, organic acid, vitamin C content, lycopene content, and sugar acid ratio. (5) Nitrogen dynamics: Plant N uptake efficiency, aboveground N accumulation, partial factor productivity of nitrogen (PFPN), and N surplus in the soil-crop system. A total of 16 key indicators were measured over these categories. The results showed that the optimal FA application rate was determined to construct the evaluation model using both the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Specifically, the FA application significantly increased (P<0.05) the concentrations of NO3-N, NH4+-N, TN, and TC in the 0-60 cm soil layer, compared with the CK control. Significant improvements (P<0.05) were observed in the plant height, stem diameter, LAI, aboveground biomass, leaf SPAD value, and photosynthetic parameters in the FA-amended plots. The FA3 and FA4 treatments significantly increased the processing tomato yield by 8.39%-16.33% and irrigation water use efficiency by 8.39%-16.32%, respectively, compared with the CK treatment. At the same time, the better performance was achieved in the soluble sugar, soluble solids, fruit vitamin C, lycopene content, and sugar acid ratio quality parameters. In addition, the FA3 and FA4 treatments significantly increased the plant nitrogen uptake efficiency, aboveground nitrogen accumulation, and nitrogen partial factor productivity, and reduced nitrogen surplus in the soil-crop system by 9.93%-10.67% (2023) and 7.20%-7.67% (2024) (P<0.05), compared with the CK treatment. The evaluation model was integrated with the 16 indicators after AHP and PCA. The FA3 treatment (50 kg/hm2) was consistently identified as the optimal application rate of the fulvic acid under the conventional high N regime. The high nitrogen fertilization was realized with the fulvic acid. Particularly, the highly effective strategy was provided for the tomato production under drip irrigation at the optimal rate of 50 kg/hm2. FA application significantly improved the soil nitrogen and carbon status, particularly for the crop growth and physiological performance, the yield, and irrigation water productivity. The key attributes of the fruit quality were promoted more efficient nitrogen utilization, thereby substantially reducing the risk of nitrogen loss and environmental pollution. These findings can also provide a robust theoretical and practical solution to increase the yield and quality of the nitrogen use efficiency in tomato cultivation.

CLC number: S275.6 Document code: A Article ID: 1002-6819(2025)-20-0106-11

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering
Pages 106-116

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
ZHOU Z, WANG Z, ZHANG J, et al. Effects of fulvic acid application on drip irrigation processing tomato yield, quality, and soil nitrogen balance. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2025, 41(20): 106-116. https://doi.org/10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.202503146

183

Views

1

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

1

Scopus

Received: 20 March 2025
Revised: 27 August 2025
Published: 31 October 2025
© Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering 2025