AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (526 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese

Distribution and alcohol-based index analysis of diverse forest and grass biomass resources in China

Hao WANG1Yu WANG1,2,3( )Jinping LI1,3Tingzhou LEI4Miao TIAN1Neng'an LI1
School of Energy and Power Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730000, China
Key Laboratory of Inland River Basin Ecology and Hydrology, Northwest Institute of Ecological Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China
Key Laboratory of Biomass Energy and Solar Energy Complementary Energy Supply System of Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730050, China
Institute of Urban and Rural Mining, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Forest and grass raw materials are abundant resources in China. The proper utilization of these resources can greatly contribute to environmental issues arising from forest and grass wastes. Therefore, this study aims to classify the representative forest and grass raw materials across mainland China. The forest and grass crops were determined in each region, according to geographical coordinates. A systematic analysis was implemented to explore the distribution and composition of diverse forest and grass raw materials. Specific indicators were measured, such as the contents of moisture, cellulose, hemicellulose, carbon, oxygen, volatile matter, and calorific value. A framework of database retrieval was established for the composition and structural analysis of diverse forest and grass raw materials. The results indicated that the sugar beet in the East China region exhibited a moisture content ranging from 80% to 90%, with a relatively lower carbon content, compared with the rest energy grasses. Nevertheless, sugar beet was unsuitable for biomass ethanol use, with a higher oxygen content of 46%, compared with the forest and grass raw materials. Soybeans shared the 40% cellulose content significantly lower than the rest. Furthermore, maize and rice crop straws showed relatively lower contents of moisture and ash, with lower oxygen and similar carbon content. Additionally, maize straws in the Southwest exhibited the highest cellulose content among various forest and grass raw materials. Consequently, maize and rice straws were suitable for biomass ethanol utilization. Ryegrass in the Northwest and sugarcane in the East and South presented a higher specific heat capacity ranging from 3.2 to 4.8 J/(kg·K), whereas other energy grasses generally ranged from 0.8 to 2.4 J/(kg·K). There were some correlations among the physical properties, chemical compositions, industrial compositions, elemental compositions, and ethanol utilization potential of typical forest and grass raw materials. This finding can provide essential support and data references for the ethanol utilization of diverse forest and grass resources.

CLC number: S21 Document code: A

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering
Pages 298-308

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
WANG H, WANG Y, LI J, et al. Distribution and alcohol-based index analysis of diverse forest and grass biomass resources in China. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2024, 40(6): 298-308. https://doi.org/10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.202311021

404

Views

5

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

4

Scopus

Received: 02 November 2023
Revised: 30 January 2024
Published: 31 March 2024
© Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering 2024