AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1,002.1 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Research on the knowledge graph of accidental explosion damage

Jimin WANG1Can JIANG1Bin HAN1Xing WANG2,3Lei ZHANG2,3( )
College of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, Jiangsu, China
State Key Laboratory of Target Vulnerability Assessment, Luoyang 471023, Henan, China
Institution of Engineering Protection, IDE, AMS, PLA, Luoyang 471023, Henan, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Constructing a knowledge graph for accidental explosion damage using investigation reports of explosion accident characterized by multi-source, heterogeneous, and overlapping information plays a significant role in data-driven explosion assessment and traceability analysis. To address the overlapping and nested events in accidental explosion investigation data, a knowledge graph construction method centered on event joint extraction was employed, utilizing explosion investigation reports to build the accidental explosion damage knowledge graph. By retrieving similar explosion events within the knowledge graph using cosine similarity and applying a Bayesian classification method, the type of explosive materials involved in the Beirut port explosion incident was identified with relatively high accuracy. The knowledge graph construction results demonstrate that on the accidental explosion damage corpus, the proposed dynamic masking-based event joint extraction method improved the F1 scores for event classification and event element classification by at least 2% and 5.4%, respectively, compared to existing extraction models. Traceability analysis indicates that knowledge graph-based traceability offers significant improvements in both speed and accuracy compared to traditional manual traceability methods.

CLC number: O389 Document code: A

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Explosion and Shock Waves

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
WANG J, JIANG C, HAN B, et al. Research on the knowledge graph of accidental explosion damage. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2026, 46(5). https://doi.org/10.11883/bzycj-2025-0329

123

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 30 September 2025
Revised: 02 February 2026
Published: 05 May 2026
© 2026 Editorial Office of Explosion and Shock Waves

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)