AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (28.7 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Analysis of the competing mechanisms between inertial and structural effects in data-driven hybrid lattice structures

Rong XU, Yu HU, Yuanyuan DING( ), Kebin LI, Fenghua ZHOU
Key Laboratory of Impact and Safety Engineering, Ministry of Education, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, Zhejiang, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Through spatial arrangement of different microstructures, well-designed hybrid lattice structures exhibit enhanced mechanical properties compared with uniform lattice structures composed of a single unit cell, thereby serving as a promising strategy for lightweight lattice structure design. However, current microstructure design approaches for hybrid lattices primarily focus on improving quasi-static compressive mechanical performance. In reality, engineering protection often involves complex dynamic impact environments rather than simple quasi-static loads. However, research on the microstructural design of hybrid lattices under high strain rate impact loading remains limited. This is due to the significant influence of inertial effects on dynamic structural mechanical response, which complicates multi-objective optimization. A fourth-order hybrid orthogonal isotropic lattice structure was constructed using two types of rhombic dodecahedron (RD) unit cells with different relative densities. A bidirectional long short-term memory (Bi-LSTM) network was employed to develop a predictive model that expanded the dataset of stress-strain curves obtained from finite element simulations. The reliability of the model’s predictions was validated through multi-dimensional evaluation metrics based on the predicted stress points along the stress–strain curves. The coefficient of determination (R2) of the predicted results reached 0.971 and 0.990 under dynamic and quasi-static compression, respectively. Specific energy absorption (SEA) was adopted as an indicator for evaluating energy absorption capacity based on the accurately predicted stress-strain curves. The structural effects on the energy absorption behavior of the hybrid lattice were analyzed under quasi-static planar compression. By increasing the compression speed to 100 m/s to simulate high strain rate conditions, the role of inertial effects on the dynamic mechanical response was investigated through comparative analysis. Furthermore, the competition and synergy between inertial effects and structural effects were systematically analyzed by categorizing the hybrid lattices according to the degree of unit cell mixing. The results indicate that inertial effects become dominant under high strain rate loading, while structural effects govern the response under quasi-static conditions. By using machine learning to efficiently expand the data scale of finite element simulations, the internal relationships among inertial effects, unit cell proportion, and spatial arrangement under high strain rate conditions were revealed. The findings provide valuable insights for the application of hybrid lattice structures in impact protection and related engineering fields.

CLC number: O383 Document code: A

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Explosion and Shock Waves

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
XU R, HU Y, DING Y, et al. Analysis of the competing mechanisms between inertial and structural effects in data-driven hybrid lattice structures. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2026, 46(10). https://doi.org/10.11883/bzycj-2025-0327

3

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 29 September 2025
Revised: 22 April 2026
Published: 05 October 2026
© 2026 Editorial Office of Explosion and Shock Waves

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)