Open Access
Issue
Published:
29 September 2021
Large scale mapping of forest attributes using heterogeneous sets of airborne laser scanning and National Forest Inventory data
(
),
Johannes Breidenbach(
)
Download citation
465
Views
4
Downloads
25
Crossref
27
WoS
28
Scopus
0
CSCD
The Norwegian forest resource map (SR16) maps forest attributes by combining national forest inventory (NFI), airborne laser scanning (ALS) and other remotely sensed data. While the ALS data were acquired over a time interval of 10 years using various sensors and settings, the NFI data are continuously collected. Aims of this study were to analyze the effects of stratification on models linking remotely sensed and field data, and assess the accuracy overall and at the ALS project level.
The model dataset consisted of 9203 NFI field plots and data from 367 ALS projects, covering 17 Mha and 2/3 of the productive forest in Norway. Mixed-effects regression models were used to account for differences among ALS projects. Two types of stratification were used to fit models: 1) stratification by the three main tree species groups spruce, pine and deciduous resulted in species-specific models that can utilize a satellite-based species map for improving predictions, and 2) stratification by species and maturity class resulted in stratum-specific models that can be used in forest management inventories where each stand regularly is visually stratified accordingly. Stratified models were compared to general models that were fit without stratifying the data.
The species-specific models had relative root-mean-squared errors (RMSEs) of 35%, 34%, 31%, and 12% for volume, aboveground biomass, basal area, and Lorey's height, respectively. These RMSEs were 2–7 percentage points (pp) smaller than those of general models. When validating using predicted species, RMSEs were 0–4 pp. smaller than those of general models. Models stratified by main species and maturity class further improved RMSEs compared to species-specific models by up to 1.8 pp. Using mixed-effects models over ordinary least squares models resulted in a decrease of RMSE for timber volume of 1.0–3.9 pp., depending on the main tree species. RMSEs for timber volume ranged between 19%–59% among individual ALS projects.
The stratification by tree species considerably improved models of forest structural variables. A further stratification by maturity class improved these models only moderately. The accuracy of the models utilized in SR16 were within the range reported from other ALS-based forest inventories, but local variations are apparent.
menu
Large scale mapping of forest attributes using heterogeneous sets of airborne laser scanning and National Forest Inventory data
(
), Johannes Breidenbach(
)
Abstract
The Norwegian forest resource map (SR16) maps forest attributes by combining national forest inventory (NFI), airborne laser scanning (ALS) and other remotely sensed data. While the ALS data were acquired over a time interval of 10 years using various sensors and settings, the NFI data are continuously collected. Aims of this study were to analyze the effects of stratification on models linking remotely sensed and field data, and assess the accuracy overall and at the ALS project level.
The model dataset consisted of 9203 NFI field plots and data from 367 ALS projects, covering 17 Mha and 2/3 of the productive forest in Norway. Mixed-effects regression models were used to account for differences among ALS projects. Two types of stratification were used to fit models: 1) stratification by the three main tree species groups spruce, pine and deciduous resulted in species-specific models that can utilize a satellite-based species map for improving predictions, and 2) stratification by species and maturity class resulted in stratum-specific models that can be used in forest management inventories where each stand regularly is visually stratified accordingly. Stratified models were compared to general models that were fit without stratifying the data.
The species-specific models had relative root-mean-squared errors (RMSEs) of 35%, 34%, 31%, and 12% for volume, aboveground biomass, basal area, and Lorey's height, respectively. These RMSEs were 2–7 percentage points (pp) smaller than those of general models. When validating using predicted species, RMSEs were 0–4 pp. smaller than those of general models. Models stratified by main species and maturity class further improved RMSEs compared to species-specific models by up to 1.8 pp. Using mixed-effects models over ordinary least squares models resulted in a decrease of RMSE for timber volume of 1.0–3.9 pp., depending on the main tree species. RMSEs for timber volume ranged between 19%–59% among individual ALS projects.
The stratification by tree species considerably improved models of forest structural variables. A further stratification by maturity class improved these models only moderately. The accuracy of the models utilized in SR16 were within the range reported from other ALS-based forest inventories, but local variations are apparent.
References(38)
Ahmadi K, Kalantar B, Saeidi V, Harandi EKG, Janizadeh S, Ueda N (2020) Comparison of machine learning methods for mapping the stand characteristics of temperate forests using multi-spectral sentinel-2 data. Remote Sens 12: 3019. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12183019
Asner GP, Mascaro J, Muller-Landau HC, Vieilledent G, Vaudry R, Rasamoelina M, Hall JS, van Breugel M (2012) A universal airborne LiDAR approach for tropical forest carbon mapping. Oecologia 168: 1147–1160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-011-2165-z
Astrup R, Rahlf J, Bjørkelo K, Debella-Gilo M, Gjertsen A-K, Breidenbach J (2019) Forest information at multiple scales: development, evaluation and application of the Norwegian forest resources map SR16. Scand J Forest Res 34: 484–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2019.1588989
Bohlin J, Bohlin I, Jonzén J, Nilsson M (2017) Mapping forest attributes using data from stereophotogrammetry of aerial images and field data from the national forest inventory. Silva Fenn 51. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.2021
Breidenbach J, Astrup R (2012) Small area estimation of forest attributes in the Norwegian National Forest Inventory. Eur J Forest Res 131: 1255–1267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-012-0596-7
Breidenbach J, Granhus A, Hylen G, Eriksen R, Astrup R (2020) A century of National Forest Inventory in Norway – informing past, present, and future decisions. For Ecosyst 7: 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-020-00261-0
Breidenbach J, McRoberts RE, Astrup R (2016) Empirical coverage of model-based variance estimators for remote sensing assisted estimation of stand-level timber volume. Remote Sens Environ 173: 274–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.07.026
Breidenbach J, Waser LT, Debella-Gilo M, Schumacher J, Rahlf J, Hauglin M, Puliti S, Astrup R (2021) National mapping and estimation of forest area by dominant tree species using Sentinel-2 data. Can J For Res 51: 365–379. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2020-0170
Core Team R (2020) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
Gonçalves AFA, Fernandes MRDM, Silva JPM, Silva GF, Almeida AQ, Cordeiro NG, Silva LDC, Scolforo JRS (2019) Wood volume estimation in a semidecidual seasonal forest using MSI and SRTM data. Flor Amb 26. https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8087.037918
Hansen EH, Gobakken T, Bollandsås OM, Zahabu E, Næsset E (2015) Modeling aboveground biomass in dense tropical submontane rainforest using airborne laser scanner data. Remote Sens 7: 788–807. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs70100788
Hansen MC, Potapov PV, Moore R, Hancher M, Turubanova SA, Tyukavina A, Thau D, Stehman SV, Goetz SJ, Loveland TR, Kommareddy A, Egorov A, Chini L, Justice CO, Townshend JRG (2013) High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342: 850–853. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1244693
Ioki K, Tsuyuki S, Hirata Y, Phua M-H, Wong WVC, Ling Z-Y, Saito H, Takao G (2014) Estimating above-ground biomass of tropical rainforest of different degradation levels in northern Borneo using airborne LiDAR. Forest Ecol Manag 328: 335–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.06.003
Maltamo M, Packalen P, Kangas A (2020) From comprehensive field inventories to remotely sensed wall-to-wall stand attribute data — a brief history of management inventories in the Nordic countries1. Can J For Res. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2020-0322
Maltamo M, Packalen P, Kangas A (2021) From comprehensive field inventories to remotely sensed wall-to-wall stand attribute data — a brief history of management inventories in the Nordic countries. Can J For Res 51: 257–266. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2020-0322
Mauya EW, Ene LT, Bollandsås OM, Gobakken T, Næsset E, Malimbwi RE, Zahabu E (2015) Modelling aboveground forest biomass using airborne laser scanner data in the miombo woodlands of Tanzania. Carbon Balance Manag 10: 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-015-0037-2
McRoberts RE, Tomppo EO (2007) Remote sensing support for national forest inventories. Remote Sens Environ ForestSAT Special Issue 110: 412–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2006.09.034
McRoberts RE, Wendt DG, Nelson MD, Hansen MH (2002) Using a land cover classification based on satellite imagery to improve the precision of forest inventory area estimates. Remote Sens Environ 81: 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00330-3
Næsset E (2002) Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning laser using a practical two-stage procedure and field data. Remote Sens Environ 80: 88–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00290-5
Næsset E (2004) Practical large-scale forest stand inventory using a small-footprint airborne scanning laser. Scand J For Res 19: 164–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827580310019257
Næsset E (2009) Effects of different sensors, flying altitudes, and pulse repetition frequencies on forest canopy metrics and biophysical stand properties derived from small-footprint airborne laser data. Remote Sens Environ 113: 148–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2008.09.001
Næsset E, Gobakken T (2008) Estimation of above- and below-ground biomass across regions of the boreal forest zone using airborne laser. Remote Sens Environ 112: 3079–3090
Nilsson M, Nordkvist K, Jonzén J, Lindgren N, Axensten P, Wallerman J, Egberth M, Larsson S, Nilsson L, Eriksson J, Olsson H (2017) A nationwide forest attribute map of Sweden predicted using airborne laser scanning data and field data from the national forest inventory. Remote Sens Environ 194: 447–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.10.022
Noordermeer L, Bollandsås OM, Ørka HO, Næsset E, Gobakken T (2019) Comparing the accuracies of forest attributes predicted from airborne laser scanning and digital aerial photogrammetry in operational forest inventories. Remote Sens Environ 226: 26–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.03.027
Nord-Larsen T, Schumacher J (2012) Estimation of forest resources from a country wide laser scanning survey and national forest inventory data. Remote Sens Environ 119: 148–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.12.022
Persson M, Lindberg E, Reese H (2018) Tree species classification with multi-temporal sentinel-2 data. Remote Sens 10: 1794. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10111794
Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, Core Team R (2020) nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3: 1–152 https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme. Accessed 26 Oct 2020
Rahlf J, Breidenbach J, Solberg S, Næsset E, Astrup R (2017) Digital aerial photogrammetry can efficiently support large-area forest inventories in Norway. Forestry (Lond) 90: 710–718. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpx027
Rahlf J, Hauglin M, Astrup R, Breidenbach J (2021) Timber volume estimation based on airborne laser scanning - comparing the use of national forest inventory and forest management inventory data. Ann Forest Sci 78(2): 1–4
Reese H, Nilsson M, Pahlén TG, Hagner O, Joyce S, Tingelöf U, Egberth M, Olsson H (2003) Countrywide estimates of forest variables using satellite data and field data from the national forest inventory. AMBI 32: 542–548. https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447-32.8.542
Schumacher J, Hauglin M, Astrup R, Breidenbach J (2020) Mapping forest age using National Forest Inventory, airborne laser scanning, and Sentinel-2 data. arXiv 2004: 13427 stat
Tompalski P, White JC, Coops NC, Wulder MA (2019) Demonstrating the transferability of forest inventory attribute models derived using airborne laser scanning data. Remote Sens Environ 227:110–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.04.006
van Leeuwen M, Nieuwenhuis M (2010) Retrieval of forest structural parameters using LiDAR remote sensing. Eur J For Res 129:749–770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-010-0381-4
Vidal C, Alberdi I, Hernández L, Redmond JJ (2016) National Forest Inventories: assessment of wood availability and use. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44015-6
Publication history
Copyright
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
FEEDBACK 
TOP