Journal Home > Volume 8 , Issue 2
Background

Snags (standing dead trees) are important biological legacies in forest systems, providing numerous resources as well as a record of recent tree mortality. From 1997 to 2017, we monitored snag populations in drought-influenced mixed-conifer and ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) forests in northern Arizona.

Results

Snag density increased significantly in both forest types. This increase was driven largely by a pulse in snag recruitment that occurred between 2002 and 2007, following an extreme drought year in 2002, with snag recruitment returning to pre-pulse levels in subsequent time periods. Some later years during the study also were warmer and/or drier than average, but these years were not as extreme as 2002 and did not trigger the same level of snag recruitment. Snag recruitment was not equal across tree species and size classes, resulting in significant changes in species composition and size-class distributions of snag populations in both forest types. Because trees were far more abundant than snags in these forests, the effect of this mortality pulse on tree populations was far smaller than its effect on snag populations. Snag loss rates increased over time during the study, even though many snags were newly recruited. This may reflect the increasing prevalence of white fir snags and/or snags in the smaller size classes, which generally decay faster than snags of other species or larger snags. Thus, although total numbers of snags increased, many of the newly recruited snags may not persist long enough to be valuable as nesting substrates for native wildlife.

Conclusions

Increases in snag abundance appeared to be due to a short-term tree mortality "event" rather than a longer-term pattern of elevated tree mortality. This mortality event followed a dry and extremely warm year (2002) embedded within a longer-term megadrought. Climate models suggest that years like 2002 may occur with increasing frequency in the southwestern U.S. Such years may result in additional mortality pulses, which in turn may strongly affect trajectories in abundance, structure, and composition of snag populations. Relative effects on tree populations likely will be smaller, but, over time, also could be significant.


menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
About this article

Twenty years of drought‐mediated change in snag populations in mixed‐conifer and ponderosa pine forests in Northern Arizona

Show Author's information Joseph L. GaneyJose M. IniguezScott C. VojtaAmy R. Iniguez
US Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 2500 S. Pine Knoll, AZ, 86001, Flagstaff, USA

Abstract

Background

Snags (standing dead trees) are important biological legacies in forest systems, providing numerous resources as well as a record of recent tree mortality. From 1997 to 2017, we monitored snag populations in drought-influenced mixed-conifer and ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) forests in northern Arizona.

Results

Snag density increased significantly in both forest types. This increase was driven largely by a pulse in snag recruitment that occurred between 2002 and 2007, following an extreme drought year in 2002, with snag recruitment returning to pre-pulse levels in subsequent time periods. Some later years during the study also were warmer and/or drier than average, but these years were not as extreme as 2002 and did not trigger the same level of snag recruitment. Snag recruitment was not equal across tree species and size classes, resulting in significant changes in species composition and size-class distributions of snag populations in both forest types. Because trees were far more abundant than snags in these forests, the effect of this mortality pulse on tree populations was far smaller than its effect on snag populations. Snag loss rates increased over time during the study, even though many snags were newly recruited. This may reflect the increasing prevalence of white fir snags and/or snags in the smaller size classes, which generally decay faster than snags of other species or larger snags. Thus, although total numbers of snags increased, many of the newly recruited snags may not persist long enough to be valuable as nesting substrates for native wildlife.

Conclusions

Increases in snag abundance appeared to be due to a short-term tree mortality "event" rather than a longer-term pattern of elevated tree mortality. This mortality event followed a dry and extremely warm year (2002) embedded within a longer-term megadrought. Climate models suggest that years like 2002 may occur with increasing frequency in the southwestern U.S. Such years may result in additional mortality pulses, which in turn may strongly affect trajectories in abundance, structure, and composition of snag populations. Relative effects on tree populations likely will be smaller, but, over time, also could be significant.

Keywords: Monitoring, Climate change, Tree mortality, Drought, Snag abundance, Snag creation, Snag dynamics, Species composition

References(61)

Adams HD, Guardiola-Claramonte M, Barron-Gafford GA, Villegas JC, Breshears DD, Zou CB, Troch PA, Huxman TE (2009) Temperature sensitivity of drought-induced tree mortality portends increased regional die-off under global-change-type drought. PNAS 106: 7063–7066

Allen CD, Macalady AK, Chenchouni H, Bachelet D, McDowell N, Vennetier MM, Kitzberger T, Rigling A, Breshears DD, Hogg EH, Gonzalez P, Fensham R, Zhang Z, Castro J, Demidova N, Lim J-H, Allard G, Running SW, Semerci A, Cobb N (2010) A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests. Forest Ecol Manag 259: 660–684

Alley WA (1984) The Palmer drought severity index: limitation and assumptions. J Clim Appl Meteorol 23: 1100–1109

DOI

Bentz BJ, Régnière J, Fettig CJ, Hansen EM, Hayes JL, Hicke JA, Kelsey RG, Negrón JF, Seybold SJ (2010) Climate change and bark beetles of the Western United States and Canada: Direct and indirect effects. Bioscience 60: 602–613

Bernardos DA, Chambers CL, Rabe MJ (2004) Selection of Gambel oak roosts by southwesternMyotis in ponderosa pine-dominated forests, northern Arizona. J Wildlife Manag 68: 595–601

Breshears DD, Cobb NS, Rich PM, Price KP, Allen CD, Balice RG, Romme WH, Kastens JH, Floyd ML, Belknap J, Anderson JJ, Myers OB, Meyer CW (2005) Regional vegetation die-off in response to global-change-type drought. PNAS 102: 15144–15148

Brown DE, Lowe CH, Pase CP (1980) A digitized systematic classification for ecosystems with an illustrated summary of the natural vegetation of North America. Gen Tech Rep RM-73. U. S Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, 93

Bull EL, Parks CG, Torgersen TR (1997) Trees and logs important to wildlife in the interior Columbia River Basin. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-GTR-391https://doi.org/10.2737/PNW-GTR-391
DOI

Chambers CL, Mast JN (2014) Snag dynamics and cavity excavation after bark beetle outbreaks in southwestern ponderosa pine forests. Forest Sci 60: 713–723

Conover WJ (1980) Practical nonparametric statistics, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York

Conway CJ, Martin TE (1993) Habitat suitability for Williamson's sapsuckers in mixed-conifer forests. J Wildlife Manag 57: 322–328

Cunningham JB, Balda RP, Gaud WS (1980) Selection and use of snags by secondary cavity-nesting birds of the ponderosa pine forest. USDA Forest Service Research Paper RM-222https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.98627
DOI

Davis KT, Dobrowski SZ, Higuera PE, Holden ZA, Veblen TT, Rother MT, Parks SA, Salag A, Manet MP (2019) Wildfires and climate change push low-elevation forests across a critical climate threshold for tree regeneration. PNAS 116: 6193–6198

Edworthy AB, Drevera MC, Martin K (2011) Woodpeckers increase in abundance but maintain fecundity in response to an outbreak of mountain pine bark beetles. Forest Ecol Manag 261: 203–210

Efron B, Tibshirani R (1993) An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman & Hall/CRC Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability 57. Boca Raton, FL, USA. 456

Fayta P, Machmerb MM, Steeger C (2005) Regulation of spruce bark beetles by woodpeckers- a literature review. Forest Ecol Manag 206: 1–14

Fettig CJ, Klepzig KD, Billings RF, Munson AS, Nebeker TE, Negron JF, Nowak JT (2007) The effectiveness of vegetation management practices for prevention and control of bark beetle infestations in coniferous forests of the western and southern United States. Forest Ecol Manag 238: 24 – 53

Ganey JL (1999) Snag density and composition of snag populations on two National Forests in northern Arizona. Forest Ecol Manag 117: 169–178

Ganey JL, Vojta SC (2004) Characteristics of snags containing excavated cavities in northern Arizona mixed-conifer and ponderosa pine forests. Forest Ecol Manag 199: 323–332

Ganey JL, Vojta SC (2005) Changes in snag populations in northern Arizona mixed-conifer and ponderosa pine forests, 1997–2002. Forest Sci 51: 396–405

Ganey JL, Vojta SC (2011) Tree mortality in drought–stressed mixed–conifer and ponderosa pine forests, Arizona. Forest Ecol Manag 261: 162–168

Ganey JL, Vojta SC (2012) Trends in snag populations in drought-stressed mixed-conifer and ponderosa pine forests, 1997–2007. Int J Forest Res. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/529197

Ganey JL, Vojta SC (2014) Trends in snag populations in northern Arizona mixed–conifer and ponderosa pine forests, 1997–2012. USDA Forest Service Research Paper RMRS-RP-105https://doi.org/10.2737/RMRS-RP-105
DOI

Ganey JL, Vojta SC (2017) Comparative trends in log populations in northern Arizona mixed–conifer and ponderosa pine forests following severe drought. West North Am Nat 77: 281–292

Ganey JL, White GC, Jenness JS, Vojta SC (2015) Mark-recapture estimation of snag standing rates in northern Arizona mixed-conifer and ponderosa pine forests. J Wildlife Manag 79: 1369–1377

Garfin G, Franco G, Blanco H, Comrie A, Gonzalez P, Piechota T, Smyth R, Waskom R (2014) Ch. 20: Southwest. In: Melillo JM, Richmond TC, Yohe GW (eds) Climate Change Impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessment. U.S. Global Change Research Program, 462

Harmon ME, Franklin JF, Swanson FJ, Sollins P, Gregory SV, Lattin JD, Anderson NH, Cline SP, Aumen NG, Sedell JR, Lienkamper GW, Cromack K Jr, Cummins KW (1986) Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems. Adv Ecol Res 15: 133–302

Heim RH Jr (2002) A review of twentieth-century drought indices used in the United States. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 83: 1149–1165

DOI
Hereford R (2007) Climate variation at Flagstaff, Arizona-1950 to 2007. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2007 – 1410. P 17. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Richard_Hereford/publication/282031501_Climate_Variation_at_Flagstaff_Arizona--1950_to_2007/links/5601c0e008aed9851827cb99.pdf. Accessed 19 Dec 2017https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20071410
DOI

Huang J, Kautz M, Trowbridge AM, Hammerbacher A, Raffa KF, Adams HD, Goodsman DW, Xu C, MeddensA JH, Kandasamy D, Gershenzon J, Seidl R, Hartmann H (2020) Tree defence and bark beetles in a drying world: carbon partitioning, functioning and modelling. New Phytol 225: 26–36

Huber PJ, Ronchetti KW (2009) Robust Statistics, Second Ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hobokenhttps://doi.org/10.1002/9780470434697
DOI

Kane JM, Kolb TE, McMillin JD (2014) Stand-scale tree mortality factors differ by site and species following drought in southwestern mixed–conifer forests. Forest Ecol Manag 330: 171–182

Koepke DF, Kolb TE, Adams HD (2010) Variation in woody plant mortality and dieback from severe drought among soils, plant groups, and species within a northern Arizona ecotone. Oecologia 163: 1079–1090

Koplin JR (1969) The numerical response of woodpeckers to insect prey in a subalpine forest in Colorado. Condor 71: 436–438

Koplin JR (1972) Measuring predator impact of woodpeckers on spruce beetles. J Wildlife Manag 36: 308–320

36
Laudenslayer WF Jr, Shea PJ, Valentine BE, Weatherspoon CP, Lisle TE (tech. cords. ) (2002) Proceedings of the symposium on the ecology and management of dead wood in western forests. Gen Tech Rep PSW-GTR-181. Albany, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station. 949https://doi.org/10.2737/PSW-GTR-181
DOI
McComb W, Lindenmayer D (1999) Dying, dead, and down trees. In: Hunter ML Jr (ed) Maintaining Biodiversity in Forest Ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridgehttps://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613029.012
DOI

McDowell NG, Pockman WT, Allen CD, Breshears DD, Cobb N, Kolb T, Plaut J, Sperry J, West A, Williams DG, Yepez EA (2008) Tansley Review: mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: Why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought? New Phytol 178: 719–739

McDowell NG, Williams AP, Xu C, Pockman WT, Dickman LT, Sevanto S, Pangle R, Limousin J, Plaut J, Mackay DS, Ogee J, Domec JC, Allen CD, Fisher RA, Jiang X, Muss JD, Breshears DD, Rauscher SA, Koven C (2016) Multi-scale predictions of massive conifer mortality due to chronic temperature rise. Nat Clim Change 6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/NCLIMATE2873

McKenzie D, Gedalof Z, Peterson DL, Mote P (2004) Climatic change, wildfire, and conservation. Conserv Biol 18: 890–902

Millar CL, Stephenson NL, Stephens SL (2007) Climate change and forests of the future: managing in the face of uncertainty. Ecol Appl 17: 2145–2151

Mueller RC, Scudder CM, Porter ME, Trotter RTIII, Gehring CA, Whitham TG (2005) Differential tree mortality in response to severe drought: evidence for long-term vegetation shifts. J Ecol 93: 1085–1093

Negron JF, McMillin JD, Anhold JA, Coulson D (2009) Bark beetle-caused mortality in a drought–affected ponderosa pine landscape in Arizona, USA. Forest Ecol Manag 257: 1353–1362

Niinemets U, Vallardes F (2006) Tolerance to shade, drought, and waterlogging of temperate Northern Hemisphere trees and shrubs. Ecol Monogr 76: 521–547. http://www.esapubs.org/Archive/mono/M076/020/appendia-A.htm. Accessed 11 April 2008https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9615(2006)076[0521:TTSDAW]2.0.CO;2
DOI
Palmer WC (1965) Meteorological drought. U. S. Weather Bureau Research Paper 45. 58. https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/temp-and-precip/drought/docs/palmer.pdf. Accessed 19 Dec 2017

Peet RK, Christensen NL (1987) Competition and tree death. Bioscience 37: 586–595

Rabe MJ, Morrell TE, Green H, deVos JC Jr, Miller CR (1998) Characteristics of ponderosa pine snag roosts used by reproductive bats in northern Arizona. J Wildlife Manag 62: 612–621

Rhoades CC, Hubbard RM, Hood PR, Starr BJ, Tinker DB, Elder K (2020) Snagfall the first decade after severe bark beetle infestation of high-elevation forests in Colorado, USA. Ecol Appl e02059https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2059
DOI

Saab VA, Latif QS, Dresser MA, Dudley JG (2019) Woodpecker nest survival, density, and a pine beetle outbreak. J Wildlife Manag 83: 1387–1400

Salzer MW, Kipfmueller KF (2005) Reconstructed temperature and precipitation on a millennial timescale from tree-rings in southern Colorado Plateau, USA. Clim Change 70: 465–487

Scott VE (1978) Characteristics of ponderosa pine snags used by cavity-nesting birds. J Forest 76: 26–28

Seager R, Ting MF, Held IM, Kushmir Y, Lu J, Vecchi G, Huang H, Harnick N, Leetmaa A, Lau N, Li C, Velez J, Naik N (2007) Model projections of an imminent transition to a more arid climate in southwestern United States. Science 316: 1181–1184

Smith WB (2002) Forest inventory and analysis: a national inventory and monitoring program. Environ Poll 116: S233–S242

Solvesky BG, Chambers CL (2009) Roosts of Allen's lappet-browed bat in northern Arizona. J Wildlife Manag 73: 677–682

Stephens SL, Agee JK, Fulé PZ, North MP, Romme WH, Swetnam TW, Turner MG (2013) Managing forests and fire in changing climates. Science 342: 41–42

Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner GK, Tignor MM, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (2013) IPCC 2013: Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

57
Thomas JW, Anderson RG, Maser C, Bull EL (1979) Snags. In: Thomas J W (tech. ed. ) Wildlife habitats in managed forests: The blue mountains of Oregon and Washington. USDA Agricultural Handbook 553, 60–77. Washington, D. C

Wan H-Y, Cushman SA, Ganey JL (2019) Recent and projected wildfire trends across the ranges of three spotted owl subspecies under climate change. Front Ecol Environ 7: 37. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00037

Williams AP, Cook ER, Smerdon JE, Cook BI, Abatzoglou JT, Bolles K, Baek SH, Badger AM, Livneh B (2020) Large contribution from anthropogenic warming to an emerging North American megadrought. Science 368: 314–318

Woldendorp G, Keenan RJ (2005) Coarse woody debris in Australian forest ecosystems: a review. Aust Ecol 30: 834–843

Wu H, Franklin SB, Liu J, Lu Z (2017) Relative importance of density dependence and topography on tree mortality in a subtropical mountain forest. Forest Ecol Manag 384: 169–179

Publication history
Copyright
Acknowledgements
Rights and permissions

Publication history

Received: 29 June 2020
Accepted: 23 February 2021
Published: 08 March 2021
Issue date: June 2021

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2021.

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Jenness, G. Martinez, M. Stoddard, B. Strohmeyer, and R. White for assisting in establishing plots, and L. Doll, D. and N. Ganey, and C. Vojta for help with plot sampling. J. Ellenwood, B. Higgins, K. Menasco, C. Nelson, and G. Sheppard (Kaibab National Forest) and C. Beyerhelm, A. Brown, H. Green, T. Randall-Parker, C. Taylor, and M. Whitney (Coconino National Forest) assisted with initial plot selection.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Return