Open Access
Issue
Published:
07 February 2021
Seamless integration of above- and undercanopy unmanned aerial vehicle laser scanning for forest investigation
(
),
Download citation
397
Views
10
Downloads
21
Crossref
16
WoS
20
Scopus
0
CSCD
Current automated forest investigation is facing a dilemma over how to achieve high tree- and plot-level completeness while maintaining a high cost and labor efficiency. This study tackles the challenge by exploring a new concept that enables an efficient fusion of aerial and terrestrial perspectives for digitizing and characterizing individual trees in forests through an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) that flies above and under canopies in a single operation. The advantage of such concept is that the aerial perspective from the above-canopy UAV and the terrestrial perspective from the under-canopy UAV can be seamlessly integrated in one flight, thus grants the access to simultaneous high completeness, high efficiency, and low cost.
In the experiment, an approximately 0.5 ha forest was covered in ca. 10 min from takeoff to landing. The GNSS-IMU based positioning supports a geometric accuracy of the produced point cloud that is equivalent to that of the mobile mapping systems, which leads to a 2–4 cm RMSE of the diameter at the breast height estimates, and a 4–7 cm RMSE of the stem curve estimates.
Results of the experiment suggested that the integrated flight is capable of combining the high completeness of upper canopies from the above-canopy perspective and the high completeness of stems from the terrestrial perspective. Thus, it is a solution to combine the advantages of the terrestrial static, the mobile, and the above-canopy UAV observations, which is a promising step forward to achieve a fully autonomous in situ forest inventory. Future studies should be aimed to further improve the platform positioning, and to automatize the UAV operation.
menu
Seamless integration of above- and undercanopy unmanned aerial vehicle laser scanning for forest investigation
(
),
Abstract
Current automated forest investigation is facing a dilemma over how to achieve high tree- and plot-level completeness while maintaining a high cost and labor efficiency. This study tackles the challenge by exploring a new concept that enables an efficient fusion of aerial and terrestrial perspectives for digitizing and characterizing individual trees in forests through an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) that flies above and under canopies in a single operation. The advantage of such concept is that the aerial perspective from the above-canopy UAV and the terrestrial perspective from the under-canopy UAV can be seamlessly integrated in one flight, thus grants the access to simultaneous high completeness, high efficiency, and low cost.
In the experiment, an approximately 0.5 ha forest was covered in ca. 10 min from takeoff to landing. The GNSS-IMU based positioning supports a geometric accuracy of the produced point cloud that is equivalent to that of the mobile mapping systems, which leads to a 2–4 cm RMSE of the diameter at the breast height estimates, and a 4–7 cm RMSE of the stem curve estimates.
Results of the experiment suggested that the integrated flight is capable of combining the high completeness of upper canopies from the above-canopy perspective and the high completeness of stems from the terrestrial perspective. Thus, it is a solution to combine the advantages of the terrestrial static, the mobile, and the above-canopy UAV observations, which is a promising step forward to achieve a fully autonomous in situ forest inventory. Future studies should be aimed to further improve the platform positioning, and to automatize the UAV operation.
References(42)
Brede B, Calders K, Lau A, Raumonen P, Bartholomeus HM, Herold M, Kooistra L (2019) Non-destructive tree volume estimation through quantitative structure modelling: comparing UAV laser scanning with terrestrial LIDAR. Remote Sens Environ 233: 111355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111355
Brede B, Lau A, Bartholomeus H, Kooistra L (2017) Comparing RIEGL RiCOPTER UAV LiDAR derived canopy height and DBH with terrestrial LiDAR. Sensors 17: 2371. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17102371
Bruggisser M, Hollaus M, Otepka J, Pfeifer N (2020) Influence of ULS acquisition characteristics on tree stem parameter estimation. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 168: 28–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.08.002
Calders K, Adams J, Armston J, Bartholomeus H, Bauwens S, Bentley LP, Chave J, Danson FM, Demol M, Disney M, Gaulton R, Krishna Moorthy SM, Levick SR, Saarinen N, Schaaf C, Stovall A, Terryn L, Wilkes P, Verbeeck H (2020) Terrestrial laser scanning in forest ecology: expanding the horizon. Remote Sens Environ 251: 112102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.112102
Chisholm RA, Cui J, Lum SKY, Chen BM (2013) UAV LiDAR for below-canopy forest surveys. J Unmanned Veh Syst 1: 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1139/juvs-2013-0017
Coomes DA, Dalponte M, Jucker T, Asner GP, Banin LF, Burslem DF, Lewis SL, Nilus R, Phillips OL, Phua M-H (2017) Area-based vs tree-centric approaches to mapping forest carbon in southeast Asian forests from airborne laser scanning data. Remote Sens Environ 194: 77–88
Dai W, Yang B, Liang X, Dong Z, Huang R, Wang Y, Li W (2019) Automated fusion of forest airborne and terrestrial point clouds through canopy density analysis. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 156: 94–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.08.008
Dalponte M, Jucker T, Liu S, Frizzera L, Gianelle D (2019) Characterizing forest carbon dynamics using multi-temporal lidar data. Remote Sens Environ 224: 412–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.02.018
Del Perugia B, Giannetti F, Chirici G, Travaglini D (2019) Influence of scan density on the estimation of single-tree attributes by hand-held mobile laser scanning. Forests 10: 277. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10030277
Giannetti F, Puletti N, Quatrini V, Travaglini D, Bottalico F, Corona P, Chirici G (2018) Integrating terrestrial and airborne laser scanning for the assessment of single-tree attributes in Mediterranean forest stands. Eur J Remote Sens 51: 795–807. https://doi.org/10.1080/22797254.2018.1482733
Hyyppä E, Hyyppä J, Hakala T, Kukko A, Wulder MA, White JC, Pyörälä J, Yu X, Wang Y, Virtanen J-P, Pohjavirta O, Liang X, Holopainen M, Kaartinen H (2020a) Under-canopy UAV laser scanning for accurate forest field measurements. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 164: 41–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.03.021
Hyyppä E, Kukko A, Kaijaluoto R, White JC, Wulder MA, Pyörälä J, Liang X, Yu X, Wang Y, Kaartinen H (2020b) Accurate derivation of stem curve and volume using backpack mobile laser scanning. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 161: 246–262
Jaakkola A, Hyyppä J, Yu X, Kukko A, Kaartinen H, Liang X, Hyyppä H, Wang Y (2017) Autonomous collection of forest field reference—the outlook and a first step with UAV laser scanning. Remote Sens 9: 785. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9080785
Kaartinen H, Hyyppä J, Vastaranta M, Kukko A, Jaakkola A, Yu X, Pyörälä J, Liang X, Liu J, Wang Y, Kaijaluoto R, Melkas T, Holopainen M, Hyyppä H (2015) Accuracy of kinematic positioning using global satellite navigation systems under forest canopies. Forests 6: 3218–3236. https://doi.org/10.3390/f6093218
Kukko A, Kaijaluoto R, Kaartinen H, Lehtola VV, Jaakkola A, Hyyppä J (2017) Graph SLAM correction for single scanner MLS forest data under boreal forest canopy. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 132: 199–209
Kuželka K, Slavík M, Surový P (2020) Very high density point clouds from UAV laser scanning for automatic tree stem detection and direct diameter measurement. Remote Sens 12: 1236. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12081236
Kuželka K, Surový P (2018) Mapping forest structure using uas inside flight capabilities. Sensors 18: 2245. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18072245
Liang X, Kankare V, Hyyppä J, Wang Y, Kukko A, Haggrén H, Yu X, Kaartinen H, Jaakkola A, Guan F, Holopainen M, Vastaranta M (2016) Terrestrial laser scanning in forest inventories. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 115: 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.01.006
Liang X, Wang Y, Jaakkola A, Kukko A, Kaartinen H, Hyyppä J, Honkavaara E, Liu J (2015) Forest data collection using terrestrial image-based point clouds from a handheld camera compared to terrestrial and personal laser scanning. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 53: 5117–5132. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2015.2417316
Liang X, Wang Y, Pyörälä J, Lehtomäki M, Yu X, Kaartinen H, Kukko A, Honkavaara E, Issaoui AEI, Nevalainen O, Vaaja M, Virtanen J-P, Katoh M, Deng S (2019) Forest in situ observations using unmanned aerial vehicle as an alternative of terrestrial measurements. For Ecosyst 6: 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-019-0173-3
Mokroš M, Liang X, Surový P, Valent P, Čerňava J, Chudý F, Tunák D, Saloň Š, Merganič J (2018) Evaluation of close-range photogrammetry image collection methods for estimating tree diameters. ISPRS Int J Geo Inf 7: 93. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi7030093
Morsdorf F, Eck C, Zgraggen C, Imbach B, Schneider FD, Kükenbrink D (2017) UAV-based LiDAR acquisition for the derivation of high-resolution forest and ground information. Lead Edge 36: 566–570. https://doi.org/10.1190/tle36070566.1
Paris C, Kelbe D, van Aardt J, Bruzzone L (2017) A novel automatic method for the fusion of ALS and TLS LiDAR data for robust assessment of tree crown structure. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 55: 3679–3693. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2017.2675963
Pyörälä J, Saarinen N, Kankare V, Coops NC, Liang X, Wang Y, Holopainen M, Hyyppä J, Vastaranta M (2019) Variability of wood properties using airborne and terrestrial laser scanning. Remote Sens Environ 235: 111474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111474
Roşca S, Suomalainen J, Bartholomeus H, Herold M (2018) Comparing terrestrial laser scanning and unmanned aerial vehicle structure from motion to assess top of canopy structure in tropical forests. Interface Focus 8: 20170038. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2017.0038
Saarinen N, Kankare V, Vastaranta M, Luoma V, Pyörälä J, Tanhuanpää T, Liang X, Kaartinen H, Kukko A, Jaakkola A (2017) Feasibility of terrestrial laser scanning for collecting stem volume information from single trees. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 123: 140–158
Shao J, Zhang W, Mellado N, Jin S, Cai S, Luo L, Yang L, Yan G, Zhou G (2020a) Single scanner BLS system for forest plot mapping. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2020.2999413
Shao J, Zhang W, Mellado N, Wang N, Jin S, Cai S, Luo L, Lejemble T, Yan G (2020b) SLAM-aided forest plot mapping combining terrestrial and mobile laser scanning. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 163: 214–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.03.008
Urbazaev M, Thiel C, Cremer F, Dubayah R, Migliavacca M, Reichstein M, Schmullius C (2018) Estimation of forest aboveground biomass and uncertainties by integration of field measurements, airborne LiDAR, and SAR and optical satellite data in Mexico. Carbon Balance Manag 13: 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-018-0093-5
Wallace L, Hillman S, Reinke K, Hally B (2017) Non-destructive estimation of above-ground surface and near-surface biomass using 3D terrestrial remote sensing techniques. Methods Ecol Evol 8: 1607–1616. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12759
Wang C, Wang J, Shen Y, Zhang X (2019) Autonomous navigation of UAVs in large-scale complex environments: a deep reinforcement learning approach. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 68: 2124–2136. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2018.2890773
Wang Y, Lehtomäki M, Liang X, Pyörälä J, Kukko A, Jaakkola A, Liu J, Feng Z, Chen R, Hyyppä J (2019a) Is field-measured tree height as reliable as believed – a comparison study of tree height estimates from field measurement, airborne laser scanning and terrestrial laser scanning in a boreal forest. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 147: 132–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.11.008
Wang Y, Pyörälä J, Liang X, Lehtomäki M, Kukko A, Yu X, Kaartinen H, Hyyppä J (2019b) In situ biomass estimation at tree and plot levels: what did data record and what did algorithms derive from terrestrial and aerial point clouds in boreal forest. Remote Sens Environ 232: 111309
Wieser M, Mandlburger G, Hollaus M, Otepka J, Glira P, Pfeifer N (2017) A case study of UAS borne laser scanning for measurement of tree stem diameter. Remote Sens 9:1154. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9111154
Wu D, Johansen K, Phinn S, Robson A (2020) Suitability of airborne and terrestrial laser scanning for mapping tree crop structural metrics for improved orchard management. Remote Sens 12:1647. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12101647
Publication history
Copyright
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by the Strategic Research Council at the Academy of Finland project "Competence Based Growth Through Integrated Disruptive Technologies of 3D Digitalization, Robotics, Geospatial Information and Image Processing/Computing - Point Cloud Ecosystem (293389, 314312), and Academy of Finland projects "Estimating Forest Resources and Quality-related Attributes Using Automated Methods and Technologies" (334830, 334829)", "Monitoring and understanding forest ecosystem cycles" (334060).
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
FEEDBACK 
TOP